2010
DOI: 10.1080/14719031003633193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Forms of Local Governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rule of leftwing political parties is found to be related to public delivery, while rightwing political parties can be linked to contracting out and privatisation (Bel and Fageda 2010;Gradus, Dijkgraaf and Wassenaar 2014;Tavares and Camões 2010). A third political motive for putting public service delivery at arm's length, in particular, type 2 and 3 ALBs, is political instability to avoid service disruptions or to shift blame to external providers (Bordeaux 2004;Rodrigues, Tavares, and De Araújo 2012;Tavares 2017;Tavares and Camões 2010). By putting public services at arm's length, politicians may try to avoid blame when performance is pooralthough in practice this is quite difficult as citizens often still anticipate the government to intervene (Van Slyke and Roch 2004).…”
Section: Factors Explaining the Choice For Service Delivery Via Albsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rule of leftwing political parties is found to be related to public delivery, while rightwing political parties can be linked to contracting out and privatisation (Bel and Fageda 2010;Gradus, Dijkgraaf and Wassenaar 2014;Tavares and Camões 2010). A third political motive for putting public service delivery at arm's length, in particular, type 2 and 3 ALBs, is political instability to avoid service disruptions or to shift blame to external providers (Bordeaux 2004;Rodrigues, Tavares, and De Araújo 2012;Tavares 2017;Tavares and Camões 2010). By putting public services at arm's length, politicians may try to avoid blame when performance is pooralthough in practice this is quite difficult as citizens often still anticipate the government to intervene (Van Slyke and Roch 2004).…”
Section: Factors Explaining the Choice For Service Delivery Via Albsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such forms included municipally owned corporations and mixed firms (type 2 and 3 ALBs). Particularly municipally owned corporations have become increasingly popular (Grossi and Reichard 2008;Tavares 2017;Tavares and Camoes 2007;Tavares and Camões 2010;Voorn, Van Thiel, and Van Genugten 2018). Whether their creation has led to a more effective and efficient public service delivery is however not evident.…”
Section: Performance Of Albsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOCs differ from other public sector institutions as they feature appointed executive boards and have an independent corporate status (Bel, Dijkgraaf, Fageda, & Gradus, 2010; Bel, Fageda, & Mur, 2014). MOCs are typically identified as single‐purpose organizations operating under private law (Bel, Dijkgraaf, Fageda, & Gradus, 2010; Bel & Fageda, 2010; Warner & Bel, 2008), but they can also act as multipurpose ones (Bognetti & Robotti, 2007; Tavares & Camões, 2007, 2010). Because ownership can be transferred, MOCs can facilitate cooperation among municipalities and between them and the private sector (Voorn, Van Genugten, & Van Thiel, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, this journal has highlighted the numerous ways in which public bodies have developed and adopted different service delivery models (Tavares and Camões 2010;Allen et al 2016;Isaksson, Blomqvist, and Winblad 2018;Mazzei et al 2020;Warner, Aldag, and Kim 2020). Studies have found that the default approach is now to outsource services in many countries, rather than rely on in-house provision (Nemec, Merickova, and Vitek 2005;Guo and Ho 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%