2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.07.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New FRET substrate for botulinum neurotoxin type A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This series of putative, bifunctional inhibitors was evaluated using a time-dependent assay using the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) substrate SNAPtide . Enzyme and inhibitor were preincubated for 0.5–30 min, followed by 100-fold dilution into substrate solutions to initiate the enzymatic reaction, while effectively diluting the inhibitor and halting further covalent inhibition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This series of putative, bifunctional inhibitors was evaluated using a time-dependent assay using the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) substrate SNAPtide . Enzyme and inhibitor were preincubated for 0.5–30 min, followed by 100-fold dilution into substrate solutions to initiate the enzymatic reaction, while effectively diluting the inhibitor and halting further covalent inhibition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having established solid synthetic routes, hydroxamates 7-28 were evaluated for BoNT/A LC inhibition (Table 1) using a previously described 26 fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)based assay that uses a truncated form of the BoNT/A LC (amino acids 1-425) and a SNAPtide substrate. 30,31 Compounds were pre-incubated for 30 minutes at various concentrations with 10 nM BoNT/A LC followed by addition of 4 µM substrate with reaction progress fluorescently monitored at ex/em 490/523 nm. The initial target hydroxamate 7 had an IC50 value of 4.0 µM, thus showing no real improvement when compared to the alkyl-containing counterpart 6 (IC50 = 5.7 µM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, amide coupling conditions for 30 using less-reactive/orthosubstituted aniline reagents resulted in no formation of the desired product. Fortunately, a change in order of steps (route 2) reacting aniline reagents with 29 directly to give carboxylic acids (32) was successful. Furthermore, optimization of workup procedures allowed both the amide coupling and deprotection step to be combined, allowing rapid access to final compounds 7−28.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%