2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1907.10426
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New frontiers in Bayesian modeling using the INLA package in R

Abstract: The INLA package provides a tool for computationally efficient Bayesian modeling and inference for various widely used models, more formally the class of latent Gaussian models. It is a non-sampling based framework which provides approximate results for Bayesian inference, using sparse matrices. The swift uptake of this framework for Bayesian modeling is rooted in the computational efficiency of the approach and catalyzed by the demand presented by the big data era. In this paper, we present new developments w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study, we considered the heterogeneity within each train in both two statistical models, however, the heterogeneity among trains are not touched yet and could be considered in the further investigation, for example frailty Cox model and/or fitting the two models from Bayesian perspective with random effects among trains (Niekerk et al, 2019). In addition, how to choose the changing point and how many changing points in a heterogeneous Markov chain process become critical problems, since the estimated transition intensity matrix may be sensitive to the choices which are very subjective.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study, we considered the heterogeneity within each train in both two statistical models, however, the heterogeneity among trains are not touched yet and could be considered in the further investigation, for example frailty Cox model and/or fitting the two models from Bayesian perspective with random effects among trains (Niekerk et al, 2019). In addition, how to choose the changing point and how many changing points in a heterogeneous Markov chain process become critical problems, since the estimated transition intensity matrix may be sensitive to the choices which are very subjective.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable inferences may require compromises with respect to the complexity of the latent model and the number of observations, which jointly determine the size and sparsity of the Gaussian precision matrices, which in turn influence computation times, memory requirements and well-conditioned numerical behavior. Even stronger restrictions arise with methods such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to achieve approximation quality comparable to INLA (Taylor & Diggle 2014, van Niekerk et al 2019. Krainski et al (2018, §8.4) develop strategies for LGCPs by aggregating the events to larger mapping units and lowering spatial-temporal resolution of random effects to decrease computation times, which, however, would impede modeling structures arising at small spatiotemporal scales.…”
Section: Data Aggregation and Subsampling Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA Rue et al, 2009, 2017Opitz, 2017;van Niekerk et al, 2019) provides relatively fast and accurate analytical approximations for posterior inference in models with latent Gaussian processes. The distribution of the observed variables may be non-Gaussian conditional on the latent Gaussian process, although here the focus of our modeling approach for conditional extremes will be on Gaussian responses;…”
Section: Bayesian Inference With the Integrated Nested Laplace Approx...mentioning
confidence: 99%