2014
DOI: 10.14411/fp.2014.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New genus of opecoelid trematode from Pristipomoides aquilonaris (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) and its phylogenetic affinity within the family Opecoelidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plagioporus, now considered a freshwater genus, will be in this clade. The clade consisting of Podocotyloides brevis Andres et Overstreet, 2013 from 200 m depth (Andres and Overstreet 2013) and Neolebouria lanceolata (Price, 1934) from 329-430 m (Andres et al 2014b), both in the Gulf of Mexico/Puerto Rico region, is biologically reasonable, although, apart from being typical 'plagioporines', they share no obvious morphological synapomorphy (Price 1934).…”
Section: Deep-sea and Freshwater 'Plagioporinae' + Buticulotrema (Opementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plagioporus, now considered a freshwater genus, will be in this clade. The clade consisting of Podocotyloides brevis Andres et Overstreet, 2013 from 200 m depth (Andres and Overstreet 2013) and Neolebouria lanceolata (Price, 1934) from 329-430 m (Andres et al 2014b), both in the Gulf of Mexico/Puerto Rico region, is biologically reasonable, although, apart from being typical 'plagioporines', they share no obvious morphological synapomorphy (Price 1934).…”
Section: Deep-sea and Freshwater 'Plagioporinae' + Buticulotrema (Opementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four subfamily arrangement of the Opecoelidae, comprising the Opecoelinae, Plagioporinae, Stenakrinae, and Opecoelininae, dominated understanding of the group until recently. Some early phylogenetic efforts (Andres, Pulis & Overstreet, ; Curran, Overstreet, & Tkach, ; Shedko, Sokolov, & Atopkin, ) flagged potential problems with this classification hypothesis, but it was not until Bray, Cribb, Littlewood, and Waeschenbach () significantly increased the breadth of opecoelid taxa represented by phylogenetically informative sequence data that it became clear that opecoelids with both a well‐developed cirrus‐sac and a canalicular seminal receptacle did not form a monophyletic assemblage and, therefore, that the Plagioporinae would need to be divided into several subfamilies. Genuine species of the type genus, Plagioporus , are probably restricted to freshwater fishes (Cribb, ; Gibson & Bray, ) and sequence data generated by Fayton and Andres (), Fayton, Choudhury, McAllister, and Robison (), Fayton, McAllister, Robison, and Connior () and Sokolov, Shchenkov, and Gordeev () for representatives of these, and other Holarctic freshwater genera, provide evidence for a restricted concept of the Plagioporinae (see Martin, Huston, Cutmore, & Cribb, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these tools are extremely useful, they often have problems estimating relationships between taxa when broadly defined morphological taxa (e.g., Macvicaria Bray, 1982, andNeolebouria Gibson, 1976) are used in the analysis without including the type species (Andres et al 2014). Such problems are often nomenclatural but are necessary when trying to define sub-familial and generic relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%