2006
DOI: 10.1021/ac052027c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Guidelines for δ13C Measurements

Abstract: Consistency of δ 13 C measurements can be improved 39-47% by anchoring the δ 13 C scale with two isotopic reference materials differing substantially in 13 C/ 12 C. It is recommended that δ 13 C values of both organic and inorganic materials be measured and expressed relative to VPDB (Vienna Peedee belemnite) on a scale normalized by assigning consensus values of-46.6‰ to L-SVEC lithium carbonate and +1.95‰ to NBS 19 calcium carbonate. Uncertainties of other reference material values on this scale are improved… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
675
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 830 publications
(694 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
13
675
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the term "calibration" means to measure a laboratory gas (for instance a laboratory working standard gas that is routinely compared with samples) against a standard at higher hierarchy level and to assign to that working standard a δ 13 C-CH 4 or δD-CH 4 value traceable to the standard scale. In principle, all measurements at individual laboratories intend to ultimately anchor their working standards and sample gases to the VPDB or VSMOW scale using the RMs provided by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) or National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST; Coplen et al, 2006;Brand et al, 2014). However, since RMs and recommended calibration methods for measurements of δ 13 C-CH 4 and δD-CH 4 in air have not yet been provided (Sperlich et al, 2012, individual groups have developed their own calibration strategies.…”
Section: Standard Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the term "calibration" means to measure a laboratory gas (for instance a laboratory working standard gas that is routinely compared with samples) against a standard at higher hierarchy level and to assign to that working standard a δ 13 C-CH 4 or δD-CH 4 value traceable to the standard scale. In principle, all measurements at individual laboratories intend to ultimately anchor their working standards and sample gases to the VPDB or VSMOW scale using the RMs provided by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) or National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST; Coplen et al, 2006;Brand et al, 2014). However, since RMs and recommended calibration methods for measurements of δ 13 C-CH 4 and δD-CH 4 in air have not yet been provided (Sperlich et al, 2012, individual groups have developed their own calibration strategies.…”
Section: Standard Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite intentions of best traceability to RMs, the variety of calibrations has resulted in diverse realizations of the VPDB scale across δ 13 C-CH 4 measurement programmes. As in Table 1, the different RMs that have been applied to δ 13 C-CH 4 calibration include NBS-19 (limestone), IAEA-CO-9 (barium carbonate), LSVEC (lithium carbonate) and RM 8562-8564 (CO 2 ); see Coplen et al (2006), Brand et al (2014) and Sperlich et al (2016). It is also noted that uncertainties of assigned values for these RMs range up to a few tenths per mille and the assigned values have been revised over time , which might have complicated the realization of the standard scale at each labora-tory.…”
Section: Standard Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d 13 C values were measured on a Thermo Scientific Delta V Plus irMS. d 13 C and values were corrected for sample size dependency and then normalized to the VPDB scale with a two-point calibration and internal standards (Coplen et al, 2006). Accuracy was ± 0.09% (n ¼ 20) and precision was ±0.02% (n ¼ 5; 1s), determined by analyzing independent standards as samples and precision was determined from international standards.…”
Section: Carbon Elemental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect is most pronounced for H and O, and normalization is commonly utilized for these elements. Normalization is rarely used for C or N, though the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) now recommends that all 13 C analyses be corrected for scale normalization based on two or more standards [82]. In practice, a normalization line is constructed by analyzing a suite of standards of known isotopic compositions varying over the range of expected d values.…”
Section: Calculation Of Isotope Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%