2005
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New insights into butterfly–environment relationships using partitioning methods

Abstract: Variation partitioning and hierarchical partitioning are novel statistical approaches that provide deeper understanding of the importance of different explanatory variables for biodiversity patterns than traditional regression methods. Using these methods, the variation in occupancy and abundance of the clouded apollo butterfly (Parnassius mnemosyne L.) was decomposed into independent and joint effects of larval and adult food resources, microclimate and habitat quantity. The independent effect of habitat quan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
175
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
175
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variables that did not contribute significantly (P < 0.05) to the explained variation were excluded from the GLM (Tables 3, 4). Secondly, the partial General Liner Models (partial GLM) were used to separate the trait variations into different components: (1) a, b and c-the independent effects of PGF, climate and soil, respectively; (2) ab, ac, and bc-the interactive effects between PGF and climate, between PGF and soil, and between climate and soil, respectively; (3) abc-the interactive effect among PGF, climate and soil; (4) Unexplained variations ( Table 2, for details of the statistics, see Han et al 2011;Heikkinen et al 2005;Zhao et al 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variables that did not contribute significantly (P < 0.05) to the explained variation were excluded from the GLM (Tables 3, 4). Secondly, the partial General Liner Models (partial GLM) were used to separate the trait variations into different components: (1) a, b and c-the independent effects of PGF, climate and soil, respectively; (2) ab, ac, and bc-the interactive effects between PGF and climate, between PGF and soil, and between climate and soil, respectively; (3) abc-the interactive effect among PGF, climate and soil; (4) Unexplained variations ( Table 2, for details of the statistics, see Han et al 2011;Heikkinen et al 2005;Zhao et al 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hierarchical partitioning provides, for each explanatory variable separately, an estimate of the independent and joint contribution with all other variables (Heikkinen et al, 2005;Chevan and Sutherland, 1991;Mac-Nally, 2000;Quinn and Keough, 2002). To test the statistical significance of the independent contributions of variables, we also performed a randomization routine which yielded Z-scores for the generated distribution of randomized independent contributions, and a measure of statistical significance based on an upper 0.95 confidence limit (Mac-Nally, 2002;Heikkinen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Analyses Of the Relationships Between Green Space Coverage Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation partitioning with three explanatory matrices leads to the identification of seven fractions in this study, i.e., independent effects of MAT, MAP, and N re ; interactive effects of MAT and MAP, MAT and N re , MAP and N re , and the interactive effect of all variables. Further details about the method were given in Heikkinen et al (2005) [29]. Figure 1 was plotted with ArcGIS 10.1 software (Esri, Realands, CA, USA), and other graphs were performed by Sigma Plot 13.0 software (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%