2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New malignancies after squamous cell carcinoma and melanomas: a population-based study from Norway

Abstract: BackgroundSkin cancer survivors experience an increased risk for subsequent malignancies but the associated risk factors are poorly understood. This study examined the risk of a new primary cancer following an initial skin cancer and assessed risk factors associated with second primary cancers.MethodsAll invasive cutaneous malignant melanomas (CMM, N = 28 069) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCC, N = 24 620) diagnosed in Norway during 1955–2008 were included. Rates of new primary cancers in skin cancer survivors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, if cutaneous SCC were solely a marker of immunosuppression, we would expect to also see an increased risk of NHL after SCC, since risk of NHL is greatly increased with immunosuppression (28,29). Studies in the general population also have reported an increased risk of NHL after cutaneous SCC (6). In contrast, we found a decreased risk of NHL after cutaneous SCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, if cutaneous SCC were solely a marker of immunosuppression, we would expect to also see an increased risk of NHL after SCC, since risk of NHL is greatly increased with immunosuppression (28,29). Studies in the general population also have reported an increased risk of NHL after cutaneous SCC (6). In contrast, we found a decreased risk of NHL after cutaneous SCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three found no statistically significant difference in overall risk in men versus women [5,7,9]. Another found a statistically significantly higher SIR of 2.78 (1.61-4.80) in men in contrast to a non-statistically significant SIR of 1.27 (0.81-1.99) in women [13]. Similarly, in studies that stratified risk by age of CM diagnosis, no differences were found [6,7,9].…”
Section: Thyroid Cancer After Cutaneous Melanomamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Among the ten studies, two reported RR, seven reported SIR, and one reported odds ratio (OR). A statistically significantly increased risk of TC after CM diagnosis with a risk ratio ranging from 1.75 to 3.6 was reported in all studies except for one in Denmark [5][6][7][8][10][11][12][13][14]. Four studies stratified risk by gender.…”
Section: Thyroid Cancer After Cutaneous Melanomamentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations