2020
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate cancer risk in patients with melanoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThe risk of prostate cancer in melanoma patients has been frequently assessed. However, a comprehensive meta‐analysis specifically examining this association is lacking. Our aim was to quantify the risk of prostate cancer in melanoma patients based on the available evidence.MethodsA systematic review of the existing literature was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases by two authors independently. Studies reporting the effect size in the form of standardized incidence ratio (SIR) were u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the pooled results, melanoma survivors had an elevated risk for subsequent prostate cancer. Several hypotheses were advanced to explain for this association, among which, the role of UV exposure was the most argued one (21,43). Exposure to UV was the leading environmental cause of cutaneous melanoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the pooled results, melanoma survivors had an elevated risk for subsequent prostate cancer. Several hypotheses were advanced to explain for this association, among which, the role of UV exposure was the most argued one (21,43). Exposure to UV was the leading environmental cause of cutaneous melanoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in risk of PC remained significant even after the overadjustment for rate of PSA monitoring tests, and was over 2-fold in men with melanomas diagnosed over 10 years prior and with men diagnosed with multiple melanomas (although this latter finding should be viewed with caution given that it was based on only 7 PC cases from 71 men with more than one melanoma diagnoses) Our findings are consistent with previous studies. In a recent meta-analysis [11], Acharya et al pooled the results of 15 (out of 17) studies with 282,592 male melanoma patients and found that men diagnosed with melanoma had a 24% increased risk subsequent PC diagnosis compared to the general male population (standardised incidence ratio (SIR) = 1.24, 95% CI [1.18 to 1.30]). While the meta-analysis identified a moderate amount of heterogeneity between studies (I 2 = 75%), this appears to have primarily been driven by a single study by Wu et al, which reported men diagnosed with melanoma had 73% lower risk of subsequent PC diagnosis compared to the general male population (SIR = 0.270, 95% CI [0.127 to 0.573]) [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are consistent with previous studies. In a recent meta-analysis [ 11 ], Acharya et al pooled the results of 15 (out of 17) studies with 282,592 male melanoma patients and found that men diagnosed with melanoma had a 24% increased risk subsequent PC diagnosis compared to the general male population (standardised incidence ratio (SIR) = 1.24, 95% CI [1.18 to 1.30]). While the meta-analysis identified a moderate amount of heterogeneity between studies ( I 2 = 75%), this appears to have primarily been driven by a single study by Wu et al, which reported men diagnosed with melanoma had 73% lower risk of subsequent PC diagnosis compared to the general male population (SIR = 0.270, 95% CI [0.127 to 0.573]) [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation