2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-56581-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Materialist Methods and the Research Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of theoretical positioning, this article can be considered as metamodern, insofar as it moves beyond a postmodern position of extreme cultural relativism to propose that multiple truths may be evident at different times and that oscillations between these different positions are possible, helpful, and desirable (Thorpe et al, 2020). Metamodern theory has developed over the past 20 years as a way of moving past cultural relativism to engender the possibility of multiple truths and realities being available at different times (Kilicoglu & Kilicoglu, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of theoretical positioning, this article can be considered as metamodern, insofar as it moves beyond a postmodern position of extreme cultural relativism to propose that multiple truths may be evident at different times and that oscillations between these different positions are possible, helpful, and desirable (Thorpe et al, 2020). Metamodern theory has developed over the past 20 years as a way of moving past cultural relativism to engender the possibility of multiple truths and realities being available at different times (Kilicoglu & Kilicoglu, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directly relevant in this regard is post-qualitative inquiry (PQI), an important recent addition to social science methodological epistemology. The methodological implication of PQI is that it robustly argues for a type of pluralism that goes beyond traditional mixed methods, allowing for multiple paths to “evidence” (Thorpe et al, 2020, p. 57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%