2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New method for assessing the performance of agricultural biogas plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated Rpr1 values from the KB biogas plant were mainly lower than results reported by Schievano et al 2011, but the calculated range of Rpr1 is within the range of their values. On the other hand, Djatkov et al 2012 have calculated even higher values for the relative biogas yield, 90-161%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calculated Rpr1 values from the KB biogas plant were mainly lower than results reported by Schievano et al 2011, but the calculated range of Rpr1 is within the range of their values. On the other hand, Djatkov et al 2012 have calculated even higher values for the relative biogas yield, 90-161%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cao & Pawlowski 2012 compared energy efficiency of sewage sludge pyrolysis to anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge followed by pyrolysis with a ratio of energy content of products to the higher heating value of dry material (HHVd) of the sludge. Djatkov et al 2012 rated the overall efficiency of biogas plant by combining the results of four aspects of the biogas plant performance: biogas production, biogas utilization, environmental impacts and socio-economic efficiency. Davis et al 2009 presented a fuel energy ratio (FER), a ratio of the fuel energy produced in relation to the used fossil fuel energy, which could be employed for defining energy efficiency.…”
Section: Energy Performance Evaluation Methods From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By calculating a relatively small set of appropriate characteristic figures, the efficiency of biogas production and utilization systems can be described in quite a reliable and reproducible manner [104]. Also, using these characteristic figures, it is possible to set benchmarks for the state-of-the-art, and to compare and rank individual biogas plants [105]. The basic measuring equipment for determining the necessary performance figures includes at least the following: scale for all input materials; biogas analyzer and biogas flow meter in the supply pipe to the engine; electricity meters for the complete plant (plus for main individual consumers, possibly); operating hours counters for main components; heat meters for off-heat, digester heating and heat sales [106].…”
Section: Process Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The data from the biogas plants in operation from [43] are used to calibrate feedstock consumption for biogas production and realistic electricity and heat production. Heat demand of the digester might be modelled in more detail as a separate heat demand with seasonal effect [24].…”
Section: Case Study City Of Sabacmentioning
confidence: 99%