2014
DOI: 10.4236/jep.2014.56056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Model for Environmental Impact Assessment of Tunneling Projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental assessments are often performed by way of the use of matrix methods in which one dimension of the matrix is "impact factors" (F) and the other is the "environmental components" (EC), which are affected by the impacting factors [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental assessments are often performed by way of the use of matrix methods in which one dimension of the matrix is "impact factors" (F) and the other is the "environmental components" (EC), which are affected by the impacting factors [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Can explicitly assess the significance of measured impacts on a local, regional and national scale Communication Communicability Gives a sufficiently detailed and complete comparison of the various projects alternatives Provides a tool for a linking assessing impacts on affected geographical or social aspects. (Source: Anjaneyulu & Manickam, 2007) [4] Methodology Description A unique methodology of impact assessment of tunnelling an socio-economic and environmental aspects during construction and operation phases by incorporating matrix method in which one dimension of matrix is an Environmental Component (EC) and the another one is " Impact factors" (Ifs) was proposed by (Namin, Ghafari & Dianati, 2014) [84] . The approach emphasizes the Mirmohammadi alogorithim for 3 typical tunnels in Tehran, Eurasia tunnel in Istanbul and Tsuen vandraing tunnel in Hongkong, compared them with standard diagram of environmental component that were derived and introduced.…”
Section: Environmental Evaluation System (Ees)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on many cases of comprehensive safety accidents in the pipe gallery, Farhad et al claimed that the classification and summary of the integrated pipe gallery disasters could be divided into six main categories, which are fire, flood, gas, power outage, explosion, and oxygen deficiency. and They design different responses and preventive measures for different types of disasters [4]. Based on the study of safety issues and preventive measures for integrated pipe gallery, Dove further studied environmental and psychological issues and proposed the importance of safety monitoring and safety management in integrated pipe gallery.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%