New national and regional bryophyte records, 62

Ellis, L. T.; Afonina, Olga M.; Atwood, John J.; Bednarek-Ochyra, H.; Burghardt, Michael; Dragićević, Snežana; Vuksanović, Snežana; Espinoza-Prieto, B.; Opisso, J.; Goga, Michal; Bačkor, Martin; Graulach, A.; Hugonnot, Vincent; Королева, Н. Е.; Chandini, V. K.; Manju, C. N.; Mufeed, B.; Natcheva, Rayna; Norhazrina, Nik; Syazwana, Nur; Peralta, Denílson Fernandes; Plášek, Vítězslav; Popov, S. Yu.; Porley, R. D.; Rimac, Anja; Alegro, Antun; Vuković, Nina; Koletić, Nikola; Šegota, Vedran; Sabovljević, Marko S.; Schäfer‐Verwimp, Alfons; Sérgio, Cecı́lia; Ştefănuţ, S.; Taha, M. A.; Abou-Salama, Usama; Wolski, Grzegorz J.

doi:10.1080/03736687.2019.1706311

Cited by 16 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 96 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…; it is recognised by: (1) small gametophyte size (stems reach 1.3 cm long, 0.5-1 mm wide; (2) leaves (<1 mm long) that are ovate to ovate-lanceolate, concave and acuminate, with a distinct alar region of 2-4 rows of quadrate cells, totalling 4-10 cells; (3) sporophytes with setae 0.6-1 cm long and ovoid to ellipsoid capsules (Ireland, 1992;Ireland & Buck, 2009 Leptobryum pyriforme is widely distributed but scattered in most regions of Chile, from IV Región Limari in the north to XII Región Magallanes in the south (Müller, 2009). In XI Región Aysén it has hitherto been recorded from Provincia de Aisén, Provincia de Coyhaique and Provincia de Capitán Prat (Ellis et al, 2015c) and here it is reported from Provincia de General Carrera in the southern part of this Región. Outside mainland southern South America L. pyriforme is known from the Falkland Islands (Ellis et al, 2015b), subantarctic South Georgia (Ochyra et al, 2002a) and two stations in the maritime Antarctic (Blockeel et al, 2006b;Ochyra et al, 2008a Neckeropsis foveolata is a Neotropical-African species.…”

mentioning

confidence: 53%

“…Recently, there have been many new bryophyte records for Bolivia (Blockeel et al, 2009(Blockeel et al, , 2010Ellis et al, 2012bEllis et al, , 2013aEllis et al, , 2014aEllis et al, , 2015cEllis et al, , 2016cCykowska, 2014), but despite a summary by Churchill et al (2009), the Bolivian bryoflora still remains poorly understood and requires additional study. In Svalbard, the bryoflora appears to be better known.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Accordingly, the species is classified as a classical Afro-American species, along with about other 80 species of moss (e.g. Frahm, 1982;Allen & Crosby, 1986;Ochyra et al, 1992Ochyra et al, , 2002bWilbraham & Matcham, 2010;Ellis et al, 2012bEllis et al, , 2014aEllis et al, , 2015bOchyra & Ireland, 2016). ( projects CGL2012-30721 and CGL2015-64068-P co-financed by FEDER).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

New national and regional bryophyte records, 58

Ellis

Afonina

Doroshina

et al. 2019

Journal of Bryology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a temperate-boreal northern hemisphere species, in tropical regions known only from the East African mountains, and extending down to South Africa (Blockeel et al., 2006c). In East Africa it was first reported [as Neckera complanata (Hedw.) Huebener var. maxima Dixon] from Kenya (Mt Kenya, at 3000 m) by Dixon (1918), and it also occurs in the Taita Hills (Mbololo, at 1650 m) in the SE part of the country (Bytebier & Chuah-Petiot, 2002). It was reported from Tanzania (Mt Meru, at 2375 m) by Blockeel et al. (2003). The South African collections came from much lower altitudes (400 and 450 m). The African specimens reported by Bytebier & Chuah-Petiot (2002), Blockeel et al. (2003, 2006c) were all epiphytic. The present Ugandan specimens were collected on rocks. Altitude (4100 m) is given on only one of the two specimens, but as both were collected the same day, the other one probably comes from an approximately similar altitude. They do not represent Dixon's (1918) var. maxima, as the shoots are less than 5 cm long; in var. maxima they were up to 15 cm long. The leaves in the Ugandan specimens are slightly narrower than is typical for the species, but otherwise the specimens agree well with the rather variable A. complanata.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 53%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

New national and regional bryophyte records, 58

Ellis

Afonina

Doroshina

et al. 2019

Journal of Bryology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ignatov, T.J. Kop.& D.G. Long: Khm[59]. Evr course of the present revision, we consider its occurrence in the Russian Far East as doubtful.…”

mentioning

confidence: 65%

Mosses of the southern Russian Far East, an annotated check-list

Cherdantseva¹,

Pisarenko²,

Ignatov³

et al. 2018

Bot Pac

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The checklist of mosses of the southern part of the Russian Far East includes 816 species and 10 infraspecific taxa with references on their distribution in seven floristic regions within Primorsky and Khabarovsky Territories, Amurskaya and Sakhlinskaya Provinces and Evreiskaya Autonomous District. Seventy one species are excluded in the course of the checklist compilation, and 59 are commented as doubtful and erroneously reported from some of the Far Eastern regions, while 8 of them doubtful for the southern part of Russian Far East in general.

show abstract

“…Two of these species, Orthotrichum rogeri and O. urnigerum , are fairly widely distributed in Western and Central Europe, southern Scandinavia, the Mediterranean and the Caucasus, and are very rare in Asia in a few widely scattered sites. In contrast, O. callistomum and O. crenulatum are exceedingly rare in the Alps and Caucasus in Europe and more frequent and widely scattered in Iran [ 184 ], Central and East Asia, and O. moravicum a very rare montane species both in Central Europe and East Asia. Finally, Lewinskya vladikavkanum is exceedingly rare in the Caucasus in Eastern Europe and in the Pontic Mountains in Turkey and appearing in Central Siberia and in China.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Synopsis of Orthotrichum s. lato (Bryophyta, Orthotrichaceae) in China, with Distribution Maps and a Key to Determination

Plášek

Komínková

Ochyra

et al. 2021

Plants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A total of 46 species and two varieties of the traditionally interpreted genus Orthotrichum are currently known to occur in China. They represent five genera, including Orthotrichum (29 species), Lewinskya (14 species and two varieties), and Nyholmiella and Leratia that are represented by a single species each. The fifth genus Florschuetziella, also consisting of only one species, F. scaberrima, is an entirely neglected representative of the China’s moss flora. A list of all accepted taxa is presented and for each taxon all literature records and herbarium specimens are enumerated for provinces in which they have been recorded, and their distribution is mapped. A key to determination of Chinese orthotrichalean mosses is presented. A chronological list of 63 species and varieties and two designations, O. catagonioides and O. microsporum which have never been validly published, reported from China in the years 1892–2020 is presented. Four species, Orthotrichum brasii, O. hooglandii, O. elegans and O. gymnostomum are excluded from the bryoflora of China and Lewinskya affinis var. bohemica and Orthotrichum schimperi are recorded for the first time from this country. Phytogeography of the Chinese taxa of the orthotrichalean mosses is considered and they are grouped into eight phytogeographical elements and five sub-elements.

show abstract

New national and regional bryophyte records, 62

Cited by 16 publications

References 96 publications

New national and regional bryophyte records, 58

New national and regional bryophyte records, 58

Mosses of the southern Russian Far East, an annotated check-list

A Synopsis of Orthotrichum s. lato (Bryophyta, Orthotrichaceae) in China, with Distribution Maps and a Key to Determination

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About