2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021gl096902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Paleomagnetic and Chronological Constraints on the Late Triassic Position of the Eastern Qiangtang Terrane: Implications for the Closure of the Paleo‐Jinshajiang Ocean

Abstract: The tectonic evolution of the Paleo‐Jinshajiang Ocean, and in particular the time of its closure, is debated. Here we present new constraints on the evolution of this region from an integrated paleomagnetic and geochronologic study of the Late Triassic Batang Group volcanic rocks in Qamdo, Eastern Qiangtang Terrane (EQT). Two zircon U‐Pb ages indicate that the volcanic rocks erupted at ∼227–222 Ma. New paleomagnetic results yield a robust Late Triassic paleopole of 57.6°N, 176.4°E (A95 = 7.8°), corresponding t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plate acceleration within the Tethys realm is also traced in the northward journeys of the North Qiangtang terrane, India Craton, and Tethyan Himalaya terrane. High‐quality paleomagnetic results in the North Qiangtang terrane reveal that it drifted northward from 28 ± 9°S at ∼297 Ma (Song et al., 2017), to 8 ± 6°S at ∼259 Ma (Ma et al., 2019), to 6 ± 3°N at ∼251 Ma (Guan et al., 2021), to 19 ± 6°N at ∼241 Ma (Song et al., 2020), to 26 ± 8°N at ∼225 Ma (Yu et al., 2022), and to 29 ± 7°N at ∼209 Ma (Song et al., 2015), revealing a significant acceleration from ∼6 cm/yr during ∼297‐259 Ma to ∼17 cm/yr during ∼259‐241 Ma (Figures 9a and 9b; Table S7). India kept moving northward since it separated from Gondwana at ∼130 Ma (Bian et al., 2019; van Hinsbergen et al., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plate acceleration within the Tethys realm is also traced in the northward journeys of the North Qiangtang terrane, India Craton, and Tethyan Himalaya terrane. High‐quality paleomagnetic results in the North Qiangtang terrane reveal that it drifted northward from 28 ± 9°S at ∼297 Ma (Song et al., 2017), to 8 ± 6°S at ∼259 Ma (Ma et al., 2019), to 6 ± 3°N at ∼251 Ma (Guan et al., 2021), to 19 ± 6°N at ∼241 Ma (Song et al., 2020), to 26 ± 8°N at ∼225 Ma (Yu et al., 2022), and to 29 ± 7°N at ∼209 Ma (Song et al., 2015), revealing a significant acceleration from ∼6 cm/yr during ∼297‐259 Ma to ∼17 cm/yr during ∼259‐241 Ma (Figures 9a and 9b; Table S7). India kept moving northward since it separated from Gondwana at ∼130 Ma (Bian et al., 2019; van Hinsbergen et al., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, available results from the North Qiangtang terrane and Tethyan Himalaya seem to suggest that these two terranes had significant accelerations during their northward movement from Gondwana to Asia (Guan et al, 2021;van Hinsbergen et al, 2012;Ma et al, 2019;Song et al, 2015Song et al, , 2017Yu et al, 2022;Yuan et al, 2021Yuan et al, , 2022. Conrad and Lithgow-Bertelloni (2002) suggested that the gravitational pull of subducted slab is an essential driving force of plate motion, which may lead to an acceleration of the subducting plate (Sun, Liu, et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected all the available post Carboniferous paleopoles of the EQT and filled with the quality criteria (Van der Voo, 1990;Meert et al, 2020), as shown in Figure 11 and Table 2. Paleopoles are relatively concordant at each period, such as during the Permian (Song et al, 2017;Ma et al, 2019;Guan et al, 2021), the Triassic (Song et al, 2015(Song et al, , 2020Yu et al, 2022), the Jurassic (Cheng et al, 2012;Yan et al, 2016), and the Cretaceous (Huang et al, 1992;Tong et al, 2015;Meng et al, 2018), except that the Cenozoic poles are rather scattered (Figure 11), which are likely due to widespread local rotations during the Lhasa-Qiangtang terrane and India-Eurasia collisions (Tong et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2017) 2011) and the present day pole (Figure 11; Table 2), while given that the remagnetization time of the Middle-Upper Jurassic limestone was proposed to be Eocene in the adjacent area of only ~8 km away (Figure 1B) (Fu et al, 2021). Hence, both of the two strata likely had experienced similar Eocene remagnetizations.…”
Section: Timing and Mechanism Of Remagnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QT, one of the major terranes in the central Tibetan Plateau (Figure 1A), is further divided into the eastern Qiangtang and western Qiangtang (alternatively called the "North Qiangtang terrane" and "southern Qiangtang terrane" in the literature, respectively) terrane by the so-called Longmo Co-Shuanghu suture zone (Figure 1A) (e.g., BGMRXAR, 1993;Yin and Harrison, 2000;Pan et al, 2004;Li et al, 2009;Zhu et al, 2013). Given that the EQT is immediately south of the Jinshajiang suture zone (Figure 1A), its drift history is important to understand the evolution and closure of the Paleo-Tethys Jinshajiang Ocean (Guan et al, 2021;Yu et al, 2022), as well as the tectonic history of the "Proto-Tibet".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water salinity in the lacustrine system during the deposition of the Gongjue Formation is consistent with the occurrence of gypsum in this stratum (Figure e,f). The brackish to saline water mass in the paleolake during deposition of the Gongjue Formation intensely evaporated during the late stage of the Qamdo Basin evolution, representing a shrinkage stage of this lacustrine system, which might have resulted from collision between the Tibetan and Indian plates. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%