The Palgrave Handbook of Populism 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Parties, Populism, and Parliamentary Polarization: Evidence from Plenary Debates in the German Bundestag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constituent groups appear to have an impact on the aid positions of individual legislators, which may then affect the aid decisions of the US. Lewandowsky et al (2022) employed a quantitative text analysis with the Wordfish tool, showing that populists in parliament do not necessarily lead to increased polarization regarding specific issues in German Bundestag debates. Navarretta and Hansen (2020) analyze the words used in the Danish parliament to determine if speakers of the four parties can be detected using machine learning models.…”
Section: National Parliamentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constituent groups appear to have an impact on the aid positions of individual legislators, which may then affect the aid decisions of the US. Lewandowsky et al (2022) employed a quantitative text analysis with the Wordfish tool, showing that populists in parliament do not necessarily lead to increased polarization regarding specific issues in German Bundestag debates. Navarretta and Hansen (2020) analyze the words used in the Danish parliament to determine if speakers of the four parties can be detected using machine learning models.…”
Section: National Parliamentsmentioning
confidence: 99%