2018
DOI: 10.4064/aa8461-11-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New permutation trinomials constructed from fractional polynomials

Abstract: Permutation trinomials over finite fields consititute an active research due to their simple algebraic form, additional extraordinary properties and their wide applications in many areas of science and engineering. In the present paper, six new classes of permutation trinomials over finite fields of even characteristic are constructed from six fractional polynomials. Further, three classes of permutation trinomials over finite fields of characteristic three are raised. Distinct from most of the known permutati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same paper, they also proposed the following two conjectures, which can be used to obtain two new classes of permutation trinomials with the form (1). More recent progress on permutation trinomials can be found in [2,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same paper, they also proposed the following two conjectures, which can be used to obtain two new classes of permutation trinomials with the form (1). More recent progress on permutation trinomials can be found in [2,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let u = a −1 + a −2 m and v = a −1 · a −2 m , then we have 1) a 6 (b 4 +b 2 +1) Notice that if (4) has two or more solutions in µ 2 m +1 for some t in µ 2 m +1 , then F (x) must have a quadratic factor, say x 2 + ax + b. If so, by Lemma 3, the coefficients a, b must satisfy the relation (11). Then, to prove Conjecture 1, we only need to show that (11) has no solution in F 2 m if gcd(m, 5) = 1, To this end, define G(x, y) = x 5 + (y 2 + y)x 3 + x 2 + (y 3 + y 2 )x + y 5 + y 2 + 1.…”
Section: Proof Of Conjecturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…If so, by Lemma 3, the coefficients a, b must satisfy the relation (11). Then, to prove Conjecture 1, we only need to show that (11) has no solution in F 2 m if gcd(m, 5) = 1, To this end, define G(x, y) = x 5 + (y 2 + y)x 3 + x 2 + (y 3 + y 2 )x + y 5 + y 2 + 1.…”
Section: Proof Of Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9] the authors presented the following conjecture about permutation trinomials in characteristic 3. (1) Let q = 3 k , k even, and…”
Section: On Some Conjectures On Permutation Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation of C can be rewritten as 4,8,9,15,16,20, 21}. None of its roots is in µ q+1 and therefore C does not contains points of type (x, y) ∈ µ 2 q+1 ; that is, g(x) permutes µ q+1 .…”
Section: On Some Conjectures On Permutation Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%