A long-standing regular in the circles of controversy is the debate on the appropriateness of the common practice of treating datasets of strength measurements of brittle materials using Weibull statistics, or if they rather belong to the enclave of other probability distributions. We do not intend to take a slide into that mathematical rabbit hole, here. There have been enough strides on that terrain with valuable insights, 1-5 exposing for one, that small sample sizes, despite in compliance with standard recommendations, cannot offer the means for distinguishing between similar distributions (e.g., Gaussian, Weibull, log-normal). 6 For such experimental practices confined within single specimen sizes, distributions of a set of strength values will almost invariably appear to be of the Weibull type. 7 That alone is no definite testament of a Weibull material, that is, that its strength distribution is determined by an inherent distribution of flaw sizes of monotonically decreasing density, 8 while obeying the original assumption of the weakest link hypothesis. 9,10