2008
DOI: 10.1179/174963108x279193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Plant Foods in Roman Britain — Dispersal and Social Access

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Their archaeological rarity suggests that they were highly-prized specimens valued for social display with limited significance for the wider ecology of Roman Britain. Recent syntheses make clear that species such as almond (Prunus dulcis), fig and peach were largely restricted to high-status sites such as towns, forts and villas which are all overrepresented in the archaeological record compared with the villages and farms where the majority lived (Hingley 2000, table 10.3;van der Veen 2008, pp.97-8;van der Veen et al 2008). As with the use of archaeological evidence in support of the concept of Romanisation more generally, the selective use of the archaeobotanical evidence can mispresent elite lifestyles as typical of the majority.…”
Section: From Etymology To Ecofactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their archaeological rarity suggests that they were highly-prized specimens valued for social display with limited significance for the wider ecology of Roman Britain. Recent syntheses make clear that species such as almond (Prunus dulcis), fig and peach were largely restricted to high-status sites such as towns, forts and villas which are all overrepresented in the archaeological record compared with the villages and farms where the majority lived (Hingley 2000, table 10.3;van der Veen 2008, pp.97-8;van der Veen et al 2008). As with the use of archaeological evidence in support of the concept of Romanisation more generally, the selective use of the archaeobotanical evidence can mispresent elite lifestyles as typical of the majority.…”
Section: From Etymology To Ecofactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for the purposes of this research absolute quantification was not necessary, as the mere presence of a taxon at a site would dictate its transit by trade routes. Other contextual data recorded included the preservation mode/s of each species, the security of its identification, and the part of the plant recovered (for a detailed discussion on the potential biases of the dataset see Van der Veen et al 2008;Livarda, 2011). The distribution of sites with exotics per period showed a positive correspondence with that of habitation nuclei as recorded in the UK's national heritage repositories except for the area of Wales, where fewer archaeobotanical reports were available (see also Van der Veen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Distributing Exoticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workflow developed for the analysis of the distribution of exotics using the Romano-British transport system. (Tomlinson and Hall, 1996) and the environmental archaeology bibliography (for details on the methodology see Livarda, 2008Livarda, , 2011Livarda, , 2013Van der Veen et al 2008). The data were divided into three phases, early (ER: 1st century AD including up to early 2nd century AD), middle (MR: 2nd and 3rd centuries AD) and late (LR: 4th century AD including those starting in the 3rd century AD) Roman, and were plotted accordingly into the GIS.…”
Section: Distributing Exoticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations