2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New QSPR equations for prediction of aqueous solubility for military compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As solubility is rather not an additive property, the choice of QSPR descriptors also has to be specific. Such specificity can be assured using Simplex Representation of Molecular Structure (SiRMS) approach . This method to generate QSAR descriptors has been described briefly here .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As solubility is rather not an additive property, the choice of QSPR descriptors also has to be specific. Such specificity can be assured using Simplex Representation of Molecular Structure (SiRMS) approach . This method to generate QSAR descriptors has been described briefly here .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we have investigated aqueous solubility of military‐relevant compounds using QSPR approach . In addition, QSPR analysis of aqueous solubility of more than 2500 organic compounds which belong to different classes and the influence of salinity on solubility was the subject of other publications .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descriptors that we obtained are in Table 2. We included log Sw as an additional unknown and obtained a value of −2.81 as compared to known values of −2.89 [33], −2.74 [34], and −2.71 [25]. We left out three of the log P values of Di Toro et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one situation, we considered nitroaromatic compounds for military purposes, as its solubility in water poses a serious environmental threat. Particularly, in [ 68 ], PLS models were built on 135 training compounds and SiRMS methods. For the 155 tested compounds, the R 2 test = 0.81 (comparable to the ability of EPI Suite TM 4.0) and the 2D descriptors produced a well-fitted and robust QSPR model with R 2 = 0.90 and a Q 2 = 0.87.…”
Section: Qspr Models Based On Simplex Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%