2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New refinements and validation of the MODIS Land-Surface Temperature/Emissivity products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
722
1
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,063 publications
(747 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
722
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficients used in the split window algorithm are given by interpolating a set of multi-dimensional lookup tables (LUT) derived by linear regression of MODIS simulation data from radiative transfer calculations over wide ranges of surface and atmospheric conditions. These look up tables have been continuously upgraded (Wan et al, 2004) and comparisons between MODIS LST's and in-situ measurements across a wide set of test sites indicate the accuracy is better than 1 K with an RMS (of differences) less than 0.5 K in most cases (Wan, 2008;Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Land Surface Temperature (Lst) and Ndvimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coefficients used in the split window algorithm are given by interpolating a set of multi-dimensional lookup tables (LUT) derived by linear regression of MODIS simulation data from radiative transfer calculations over wide ranges of surface and atmospheric conditions. These look up tables have been continuously upgraded (Wan et al, 2004) and comparisons between MODIS LST's and in-situ measurements across a wide set of test sites indicate the accuracy is better than 1 K with an RMS (of differences) less than 0.5 K in most cases (Wan, 2008;Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Land Surface Temperature (Lst) and Ndvimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2d). Even though the differences in the emissivities are small this further reduces the possibility of LUT induced signal in the comparison of LST's between ISA zones (Wan, 2008).…”
Section: Quantifying the Relationship Between Lst And Isamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b) for which a homogeneous climate was assumed. Erroneous MODIS LST measurements due to incorrect cloud masking are a known issue (Wan, 2008). MODIS LSTs colder than 10°C from the regional mean in summer were assumed to be outliers due to the admixing of cloud top temperatures.…”
Section: Calculating Modis Lst Spatial Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considering the low MDs during snow melt periods spatial differences in LST due to snow were also reduced for the averaging period. Ideally, Wan (2008) recommends taking in situ measurements over large homogeneous sites with dimensions of at least 5 by 5 km, using high-accuracy radiometer measurements at multiple points. Such requirements are, however, extremely difficult to fulfill at Arctic sites, where logistical constraints limit the number of field stations.…”
Section: Uncertainties and Errors Of Modis Lst Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation of MODIS land surface temperature products has emphasised the night-time product [11,12], which is easier to validate. The effects of relative humidity, wind speed, soil moisture, air temperature and sensor view zenith angle on night time land surface temperatures have been investigated, of which only sensor view zenith angle showed a weak influence on LST error propagation [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%