2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-009-0522-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New results on restriction of Fourier multipliers

Abstract: We develop an extension of the Transference methods introduced by R. Coifman and G. Weiss and apply it to study the problem of the restriction of Fourier multipliers between rearrangement invariant spaces, obtaining natural extensions of the classical de Leeuw's result and its further extension to maximal Fourier multipliers due to C. Kenig and P. Tomas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course most of the theorems on multipliers have a similar formulation on the previously mentioned groups, and the results can actually be transferred from one group to another one using certain methods. In the setting of Lebesgue spaces, the reader is referred to [13, 35] for standard techniques on transference between Rn,Tn,Zn$\mathbb {R}^n, \mathbb {T}^n, \mathbb {Z}^n$, to [9] for general locally compact abelian groups and to [8] for an admissible pair of rearrangement invariant spaces. We also refer to [2, 5, 7, 20] for the case of weighted Lebesgue spaces and some restriction results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course most of the theorems on multipliers have a similar formulation on the previously mentioned groups, and the results can actually be transferred from one group to another one using certain methods. In the setting of Lebesgue spaces, the reader is referred to [13, 35] for standard techniques on transference between Rn,Tn,Zn$\mathbb {R}^n, \mathbb {T}^n, \mathbb {Z}^n$, to [9] for general locally compact abelian groups and to [8] for an admissible pair of rearrangement invariant spaces. We also refer to [2, 5, 7, 20] for the case of weighted Lebesgue spaces and some restriction results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following result is the weighted version of [6,Lemma 2] and the weak type maximal counterpart of [7,Proposition 4.10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%