2011
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-2760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Strategies in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Improving Outcomes in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Disease

Abstract: The past decade has seen significant breakthroughs in our knowledge of the tumor biology of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Signaling pathways that are vital for tumor growth have been identified and have been effectively targeted for pharmacologic intervention. Furthermore, advances in imaging and treatment delivery have allowed radiation oncologists to deliver therapy more precisely to mobile tumors, while minimizing the dose to surrounding critical structures. This article summarizes the implications of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All potential prognostic factors were transformed into categorical variables. The patients were grouped as male vs. female, squamous vs. non-squamous cell carcinoma, neutrophil count >7,000 vs. ≤7,000̸mm 3 (upper limit of normal), lymphocyte count ≥1,100 vs. <1,100̸mm 3 (lower limit of normal), monocyte count >600 vs. ≤600̸mm 3 (upper limit of normal), platelet count >350x10 3 vs. ≤350x10 3 ̸mm 3 (upper limit of normal), NLR <5 vs. ≥5 (ratio between neutrophil and lymphocyte counts at baseline) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) <300 vs. ≥300 (ratio between platelet and lymphocyte counts at baseline). The cut-off values of PLR and NLR were determined as previously described (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All potential prognostic factors were transformed into categorical variables. The patients were grouped as male vs. female, squamous vs. non-squamous cell carcinoma, neutrophil count >7,000 vs. ≤7,000̸mm 3 (upper limit of normal), lymphocyte count ≥1,100 vs. <1,100̸mm 3 (lower limit of normal), monocyte count >600 vs. ≤600̸mm 3 (upper limit of normal), platelet count >350x10 3 vs. ≤350x10 3 ̸mm 3 (upper limit of normal), NLR <5 vs. ≥5 (ratio between neutrophil and lymphocyte counts at baseline) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) <300 vs. ≥300 (ratio between platelet and lymphocyte counts at baseline). The cut-off values of PLR and NLR were determined as previously described (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment strategy for locally advanced non-resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (2). However, the clinical outcome is disappointing, with a 5-year survival rate of only ~20% (range, 15-40%) (3,4). Recently, combined treatment with anti-angiogenic therapy and chemotherapy or radiotherapy has shown a survival advantage (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Even with aggressive therapy, lung cancer patients with locally advanced disease who are not surgically resectable on the basis of the extent of the primary disease or regional nodal involvement, have an extremely poor long-term survival, in the order of 15 to 40%. 2 Despite improvement with combined modality therapy, both local control and survival still remain poor. 2 These facts have led researcher to investigate other possible mechanism that may play role in the progression of lung cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Despite improvement with combined modality therapy, both local control and survival still remain poor. 2 These facts have led researcher to investigate other possible mechanism that may play role in the progression of lung cancer. In recent years cancer stem cells (CSC) have emerged as the focus of intense investigations in cancer research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Despite recent technical advances in radiation therapy, incidental irradiation that damages normal lung tissue in the path of the radiation beam remains unavoidable and frequently results in radiation-induced lung injury (RILI). 3 As such, this deleterious pulmonary effect not only compromises quality of life for a subset of long-term cancer survivors but also represents a major dose-limiting factor in radiation therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%