2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New tools to assess toxicity, bioaccessibility and uptake of chemical contaminants in meat and seafood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, risk assessment and regulated limits are based on raw products although most seafood is cooked before consumption and strong variations in the concentration of contaminants occur following cooking or processing of seafood according to the cooking procedure and species (Marques et al, 2011). On the other hand, information on the effects of cooking on emerging contaminants is scarce (Domingo, 2010, Perelló et al, 2009).…”
Section: Effect Of Cookingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, risk assessment and regulated limits are based on raw products although most seafood is cooked before consumption and strong variations in the concentration of contaminants occur following cooking or processing of seafood according to the cooking procedure and species (Marques et al, 2011). On the other hand, information on the effects of cooking on emerging contaminants is scarce (Domingo, 2010, Perelló et al, 2009).…”
Section: Effect Of Cookingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, higher concentrations may be found because of the decrease of the weight of samples due to loss of water, volatiles, lipids, carbohydrates or proteins (Marques et al, 2011).…”
Section: Effect Of Cookingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there is also a need of new and alternative (in vivo) toxicity tests as well as new detection tools for testing the effects of food chemical contaminants, moving away from the mouse bioassay for food toxin analysis [146]. To achieve this goal, the use of noncarcinogenic functional cell models, of alternative animal models like zebrafish embryos, and a toxicogenomic approach, seem to be the most promising strategies for the future toxicity assessment of food chemical contaminants [147].…”
Section: Present Challenges In Food Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all conditions tested, about 70% -92% of total PAHs were found in the casing when products were filled in natural casings, irrespective of the smoking regime processed. Maximal concentrations of PAHs usually occur at the product surface (Marques, et al, 2011). Many of PAHs had been demonstrated to be carcinogenic for experimental animals and they are also supposed to have a significant impact on the disease burden caused by various cancers in human populations (Phillips, 1999 The main objective of the studies was to analyses the effect of smoking method, types of casing and cold storage time on the PAH contents in zero time and after cold storage for 90day (BaP and15PAH) the type of casing (cellulose casing and sheep casing), using (Sawdust wood).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%