2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New trends in reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separations of therapeutic peptides and proteins: Theory and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
(247 reference statements)
1
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The bigger the pore size, the more proteins can bind to the RP material. This underlines that the pore size of RP material is an important parameter to be considered for separation of proteins and peptides51, 52 and can be exploited for HLA‐I peptide isolation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bigger the pore size, the more proteins can bind to the RP material. This underlines that the pore size of RP material is an important parameter to be considered for separation of proteins and peptides51, 52 and can be exploited for HLA‐I peptide isolation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher temperature generally enhances mass transfer for proteins, leading to higher separation performance. In addition, temperature is a common parameter in chromatographic method development since selectivity and resolution can be tuned by changing this variable [25,27,29,31,39]. For the analysis of proteins under RPLC conditions, temperature affects solute adsorption on the stationary phase.…”
Section: Recovery Of Mab Species In Hilic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the biopharmaceutical field, LC is used for both the assessment of protein batch purity, protein modification (e.g. glycosylation) and aggregation [4,56]. In combination with MS, precise and complementary information is generated.…”
Section: Direct Analytical Characterization Of the Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8.0: 01/2008:0951) [58]. In CE, the separation is based on charge differences [59], in our case a loss of one positive charge of lysine with the simultaneous addition of negative charges of NOTA, whereas in RP HPLC mainly the decrease in hydrophobicity due to the attachment of NOTA leads to the separation [56]. Overall, the 1:1 and 3:1 samples show similar degrees of somatropin modification as measured with CE-MS compared to LC-MS (Fig.…”
Section: Direct Analytical Characterization Of the Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%