While many different endeavors to support name authority control in Extensible Markup Language (XML) metadata have been explored, none have been accepted as a best practice. For this reason, libraries continue to experiment with the sche-ma, tool, or process that best suits their local authority control needs in XML. This paper discusses current endeavors to support name authority control in XML for digitized collections and demonstrates an innovative manual solution developed and implemented by the University of Tennessee Libraries to achieve this goal. Even though this method for authority control in XML metadata still relies on manual efforts, it effectively reduces time and research work by efficiently setting priorities, identifying critical descriptive areas in the digital transcriptions, and identifying the most appropriate biographical resources to consult. The effectiveness of this approach in improving the rest of the metadata production workflow is evaluated and presented. Soon after starting digitization projects, many libraries and other institutions often find that keeping track of name access points in the Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a huge challenge, regardless of the XML schema used. This is particularly the case in many types of digitized objects such as manuscripts, music, and other types of special collections where the number of personal names is exponentially more than the number of items digitized; the names are dispersed all over the digitized transcriptions; and information about these names is ambiguous, vague, and incomplete. However, no matter how difficult keeping track of name access points in digitized materials is, it is necessary in order to keep digitized objects retrievable. Access points not only help in the retrieval process of documents, but also help keep materials by the same creators or about the same subjects together. To keep a successful track of name access points in XML documents, libraries have been experimenting with many different endeavors to find an effective way to achieve this goal. So far the efforts created to support name authority control in XML metadata consist of (1) using XML schemas to encode authority data; (2) endeavors for shared, cooperative, national, and international XML name databases; (3) manual and automated conversion tools from Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) to XML; and (4) automated generation of authority control through especially designed systems. The problem with most of these endeavors is that they only address the issue of how to encode name access points utilizing XML authority schema; they do not address the issue of how to extract or harvest these names directly from the XML records and transform them into useful access points. The few endeavors that have tried, such as the systems for automated generation of authority control, have only been successful in extracting names from XML records but not in turning them into