2015
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Zealanders' Attitudes toward Physician-Assisted Dying

Abstract: The results have highlighted the high value respondents place on patient autonomy with regards to end-of-life choices; however the choice to hasten death is not a 'right' that should be available to all. RESULTS have clearly shown that New Zealanders believe regulation will play a key role in maintaining compliance with any assisted dying legislation, and in restricting access, so that only patients who are suffering intolerably and hopelessly are able to legally gain medical assistance to end their life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(23 reference statements)
3
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases of tetraplegia, agreement was even lower (30.8%). This difference of acceptance, depending on the patient's situation, was also found in a survey of 677 New Zealanders, in which 49% of the interviewees understood that euthanasia or assisted suicide were the most appropriate responses for a tetraplegic patient who asks for assistance in dying 14 . However, the percentage of New Zealanders who chose euthanasia or assisted suicide as the most appropriate response for a patient suffering from an incurable disease was higher, reaching 78% 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In cases of tetraplegia, agreement was even lower (30.8%). This difference of acceptance, depending on the patient's situation, was also found in a survey of 677 New Zealanders, in which 49% of the interviewees understood that euthanasia or assisted suicide were the most appropriate responses for a tetraplegic patient who asks for assistance in dying 14 . However, the percentage of New Zealanders who chose euthanasia or assisted suicide as the most appropriate response for a patient suffering from an incurable disease was higher, reaching 78% 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Unsurprisingly, the responses of participants toward PAD mirrored that of the wider New Zealand population with some being in favor of legalizing PAD, some being completely opposed, and others vacillating between the 2. 49,50 While some GPs in this study viewed laws guiding PAD as providing security for the doctor and patient, others stated that such laws would be too proscriptive to allow for the best care for the patient, suggesting that the status quo remain. To this end, it has been suggested that it may not be in the best interests of the doctor to endorse transparency in end-of-life decision making in order to preserve maximal wiggle room.…”
Section: Legal and Ethical Imperativesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A belief in the importance of self-determination and autonomy in regard to the patient has been shown to be a reliable predictor of permissiveness toward euthanasia (Fried, Stein, O’Sullivan, Brock, & Novack, 1993; Terkamo-Moisio et al., 2017; Verbakel & Jaspers, 2010). Several studies show that physically ill individuals are perceived to be more autonomous in their decision making than are the mentally ill (e.g., Angermeyer, Matschinger, & Schomerus, 2013), and this perception could lead to the exclusion of mentally ill patients from approval for euthanasia (Rae, Johnson, & Malpas, 2015). Further, symptoms of both schizophrenia and depression could affect decisional capacity (Doernberg et al., 2016) and among the general public, this could result in reluctance/resistance/hesitancy to allow a patient autonomy in making end-of-life decisions, which, in turn, might lead to less permissiveness toward euthanasia in the context of mental illness.…”
Section: Mediators Of the Effects Of Illness Type On Attitudes Toward Euthanasiamentioning
confidence: 99%