1986
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1986.03780040060011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newborn Hearing Screening Using the Crib-O-Gram

Abstract: and is an official publication of the Association. Second-class postage paid at Chicago, IL 60610 and at additional mailing office.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were inconsistent in 101 infants (28.5 percent). On two trials performed by Durieux-Smith et al 19 and Webb et al 21 the incidence of inconsistent results were 29 and 13 percent, respectively. In the present study, one of the hearing-impaired infants passed the first COG but failed the second and third.…”
Section: Crib-o-grammentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results were inconsistent in 101 infants (28.5 percent). On two trials performed by Durieux-Smith et al 19 and Webb et al 21 the incidence of inconsistent results were 29 and 13 percent, respectively. In the present study, one of the hearing-impaired infants passed the first COG but failed the second and third.…”
Section: Crib-o-grammentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The failure rate in previously published data ranges from 8 to 23 percent. 10,[17][18][19][20][21] None of those investigators used two passes out of three trials criterion; therefore, it is difficult to compare the failure rate in our NICU population with others. The results were inconsistent in 101 infants (28.5 percent).…”
Section: Crib-o-grammentioning
confidence: 99%