2010
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.132480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis by Use of a Multiplex Immunoassay

Abstract: Background Since its beginnings newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) using an assay for immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) has been plagued by a high number of false positive results, i.e., screen-positive / diagnosis negative, despite attempts to reduce them through use of altered cutoffs and 2nd tier DNA testing. IRT exists as two isoforms: IRT1 and IRT2, with IRT2 being more closely aligned with pancreatic disease, including CF. Standardization among programs using current IRT assays recognizing either … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In future studies, taking advantage of the experience gained in developing multiplex immunoassays, biomarkers from the best performing models could be converted into multiplex assays for use in larger studies on newborns selected as described here [14]. Additional biomarkers could also be added to the panel simply through addition of appropriate beads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In future studies, taking advantage of the experience gained in developing multiplex immunoassays, biomarkers from the best performing models could be converted into multiplex assays for use in larger studies on newborns selected as described here [14]. Additional biomarkers could also be added to the panel simply through addition of appropriate beads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the immunoassay procedure have been previously published [13,14]. The Rules-Based Medicine platform is a multiplex commercial product (kit) already validated for precision, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and assay limitations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our data does not demonstrate a difference in the false positive rate pre and post the change to testing at day 5–8 (IRT—IRT protocol). The kits utilised at various stages may have affected the results, as there are various forms of IRT in blood that may react differently in the assays; however their relative merits are the subject of continuing debate 14 20. Between 1980 and 1990, as other centres adopted this screening strategy, poor interlaboratory performance in a quality assurance scheme highlighted problems related to the adaptation of the first generation of IRT radioimmunoassays for use with dried blood spots 21.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…129,130 These methods involve PCR of the target sequence with synthetic nucleobases, allele-specific target extension of the unique base in SMN1 exon 7, microbeads that hybridize to tags on the extension region, and fluorescent signal detection. An advantage of using these assays is the large multiplex capability of 80-100 targets.…”
Section: Liquid Microbead Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%