2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2008.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newton's method and the Computational Complexity of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Abstract: Several different uses of Newton's method in connection with the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra are pointed out. Theoretical subdivision schemes have been combined with the numerical Newton iteration to yield fast root-approximation methods together with a constructive proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra. The existence of the inverse near a simple zero may be used globally to convert topological methods like path-following via Newton's method to numerical schemes with probabilistic convergence. Finally… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, j k ), N 1 and N 0 1 have n À 1 leaves. In all cases, L s ðN 1 Þ ¼ L s ðN 0 1 Þ by Lemmas 32(2), 33(2) and 34 (2), and therefore, by the induction hypothesis, N 1 ffi N 0 1 . Finally, by Remark 11, N and N 0 are obtained from N 1 and N 0 1 by applying the same expansion U À1 , T À1 , or H À1 , and they are isomorphic.…”
Section: Example 29mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, j k ), N 1 and N 0 1 have n À 1 leaves. In all cases, L s ðN 1 Þ ¼ L s ðN 0 1 Þ by Lemmas 32(2), 33(2) and 34 (2), and therefore, by the induction hypothesis, N 1 ffi N 0 1 . Finally, by Remark 11, N and N 0 are obtained from N 1 and N 0 1 by applying the same expansion U À1 , T À1 , or H À1 , and they are isomorphic.…”
Section: Example 29mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These vectors L(N ) and L s (N ) can be used then to define metrics for fully resolved and arbitrary TCTC-networks, respectively, from metrics for real-valued vectors. The metrics obtained in this way can be understood as generalizations to TCTC n of the (non-splitted or splitted) nodal metrics for phylogenetic trees and they can be computed in low polynomial time if the metric used to compare the vectors can be done so: this is the case, for instance, when this metric is the Manhattan or the Euclidean metric (in the last case, computing the square root with O(10 m+n ) significant digits [2], which should be more than enough).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same holds true if we choose the scaled polynomial p 1 (z) := P 1 (σ 1 z)/σ 2 = d j=0 a j z j . Starting with p 1 we obtain the resultant R = R(s) = res t (G(t, s), H (t, s)) via equations (8), (7), (5), (4), (3) and (2). With a value k 0 such that R(k 0 ) = 0, we may consider the homotopy of square-free polynomials…”
Section: How To Proceed Along the Safe Path?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18]. We avoid a general discussion of other uses of Newton's method in root-finding; the reader may find some pointers to the literature in our survey [2].…”
Section: Our Iteration Along a Homotopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For p 2, the cost of computing d s p (T 1 , T 2 ), for T 1 , T 2 ∈ T n , as the p-th root of d s p (T 1 , T 2 ) p will depend on the accuracy with which this root is computed. For instance, using the Newton method to compute it with an accuracy of an 1/2 h -th of its value has a cost of O(p 2 log(p) log(hp)); see, for instance, [4]. So, in practice, for small p and not too large h, this step will be dominated by the computation of d s p (T 1 , T 2 ) p , and the total cost will be O(n 2 ) (we understand in this case log(p) as part of the constant factor).…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 99%