2017
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-16-0431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis and Algorithms for PDX and CDX Models

Abstract: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and circulating tumor cellderived explant (CDX) models are powerful methods for the study of human disease. In cancer research, these methods have been applied to multiple questions, including the study of metastatic progression, genetic evolution, and therapeutic drug responses. As PDX and CDX models can recapitulate the highly heterogeneous characteristics of a patient tumor, as well as their response to chemotherapy, there is considerable interest in combining them with next-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioinformatics analyses have recently been developed to distinguish human‐specific results from mixed human and mouse results. By using this approach, the possible contamination of results can largely be avoided . Moreover, considering the accumulated changes in xenograft tumors, PDX models do not reliably preserve the original information of parental tumors upon serial transplantation.…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioinformatics analyses have recently been developed to distinguish human‐specific results from mixed human and mouse results. By using this approach, the possible contamination of results can largely be avoided . Moreover, considering the accumulated changes in xenograft tumors, PDX models do not reliably preserve the original information of parental tumors upon serial transplantation.…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA-seq data were aligned to Human GRCh38 and Mouse GRCm38 assembly using Mapsplice (version 2.1.6). Xenograft data were filtered via a novel algorithm to distinguish human and mouse reads (17). The filtered reads are then used to generate counts data using Rsubread package (version 1.16.1) with Ensembl 77 GTF file in R. The counts were converted into RPKM values using edgeR (version 3.10.5).…”
Section: Rna-seqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA with RNA integrity number >7.6 (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer) was used to generate libraries with SureSelect poly A samples (Agilent) and sequenced on the NextSeq 500 using 75 bp paired end. Tumour RNAseq data were filtered via a novel algorithm to distinguish human and mouse transcripts (Khandelwal et al, 2017). Subsequently, both the tumour and the CDX-derived cell culture samples were aligned to human GRCh38 assembly using Mapsplice (Version 2.1.6) (Wang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Rnaseqmentioning
confidence: 99%