2014
DOI: 10.1038/nature13272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Niche filling slows the diversification of Himalayan songbirds

Abstract: Speciation generally involves a three-step process--range expansion, range fragmentation and the development of reproductive isolation between spatially separated populations. Speciation relies on cycling through these three steps and each may limit the rate at which new species form. We estimate phylogenetic relationships among all Himalayan songbirds to ask whether the development of reproductive isolation and ecological competition, both factors that limit range expansions, set an ultimate limit on speciati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

39
403
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(446 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
39
403
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether this pattern holds across all birds is open to question, but it seems likely given that passerines make up more than half of all avian diversity. Moreover, our results are consistent with earlier reports that average trait distances between species are smaller at low elevations for frugivores along the same gradient [23], and that the morphovolume of Himalayan songbird assemblages actually declines towards the lowlands [36]. Previous clade-level analyses across environmental gradients also reveal that the local richness of passerine families is largely unrelated to the volume of trait space they occupy [37].…”
Section: H M H M Hsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether this pattern holds across all birds is open to question, but it seems likely given that passerines make up more than half of all avian diversity. Moreover, our results are consistent with earlier reports that average trait distances between species are smaller at low elevations for frugivores along the same gradient [23], and that the morphovolume of Himalayan songbird assemblages actually declines towards the lowlands [36]. Previous clade-level analyses across environmental gradients also reveal that the local richness of passerine families is largely unrelated to the volume of trait space they occupy [37].…”
Section: H M H M Hsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The use of normalized PC trait axes when quantifying assemblage morphospace assumes that each trait axis is of similar importance in charactering avian niche space [36,37]. To test this assumption, we estimated the contribution of each PC trait in predicting guilds by removing each axis as a term from the model and calculating the drop in classification accuracy.…”
Section: (D) the Relationship Between Morphology And Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31, 50, and 51). In the Himalayas, the lack of in situ diversification of songbirds has been attributed to the filling of niches by preadapted colonizing lineages (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the backbone tree based on Ericson et al [35] to obtain a 50% majority rule consensus tree in which branch length is represented by the proportion of nucleotide substitutions (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). Being a sympatric assemblage of species, the phylogenetic relationship among them should capture differentiation mechanisms limited by niche similarities [19]. We first quantified the influence of phylogeny on variation in each trait by means of K statistics [28], to assess whether traits conserved a phylogenetic signal and whether predictors (body mass, migration strategy and ecological parameters) were not changing too fast with respect to the rate of adaptation of life histories, a condition in which adaptive variation cannot take place [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%