The
deprotonation of 1-(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-3-methylbenzimidazolium
hexafluorophosphate (2
MeH2[PF6]) and 1-(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-3-isopropylbenzimidazolium hexafluorophosphate (2
iPrH2[PF6]) with potassium tert-butoxide in THF afforded
the benzimidazolium-benzimidazolates 2
MeH
and 2
iPrH. The “instant carbene”
behavior of these conjugated mesomeric betaines was demonstrated by
trapping their carbenic tautomers 2′
MeH and 2′
iPrH with elemental sulfur
and selenium, which afforded the corresponding thio- and selenourea
derivatives 2′
MeHE and 2′
iPrHE (E = S, Se). The treatment of 2
MeH and 2
iPrH with nickelocene furnished
the nickel(II) complexes [NiCp(2′
Me)] and [NiCp(2′
iPr)], which contain
an anionic C,Namido-chelating NHC ligand. The electronic
structure and redox behavior of the nickel(II) chelates were investigated,
as well as those of the closely related chelates [NiCp(1′
Me)] and [NiCp(1′
iPr)]
derived from the corresponding imidazolium-benzimidazolates 1
MeH and 1
iPrH. According
to DFT calculations, the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)
is located over the NiCp moiety and the π system of the chelate
ligand with a large contribution from the (benz-)imidazolate moiety.
Cyclic voltammetry revealed a reversible oxidation to the monocation
[NiCp(L)]+ (E
1/2 = 0.315, 0.222,
0.396, 0.265 V vs ferrocene/ferrocenium for L = 1′
Me, 1′
iPr, 2′
Me, 2′
iPr, respectively)
in CH2Cl2/0.1 M n-Bu4N[B(ArF)4] (B(ArF)4
– = tetrakis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)borate),
and isosbestic behavior was found in UV–vis–NIR spectroelectrochemical
experiments. The different redox potentials reflect the different
donor/acceptor properties of the NHC part of the chelate ligands,
with 1′
iPr being the strongest and 2′
Me the weakest net electron donor. The
EPR spectroscopic signature of [NiCp(2′
Me)]+ in CH2Cl2/0.1 M n-Bu4N[B(ArF)4] at 100 K is consistent
with a chelate-ligand-based radical with strong spin–orbit
coupling to the Ni center. In contrast, the EPR spectra of [NiCp(1′
Me)]+, [NiCp(1′
iPr)]+, and [NiCp(2′
iPr)]+ indicate that these monocations are best
described as NiIII complexes, the comparatively higher
contribution of the NiIII(L) vs the NiII(L•+) valence tautomer being supported by the results
of open-shell DFT calculations.