2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotine reduction as an increase in the unit price of cigarettes: A behavioral economics approach

Abstract: Urgent action is needed to reduce the harm caused by smoking. Product standards that reduce the addictiveness of cigarettes are now possible both in the U.S. and in countries party to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Specifically, standards that required substantially reduced nicotine content in cigarettes could enable cessation in smokers and prevent future smoking among current non-smokers. Behavioral economics uses principles from the field of microeconomics to characterize how consumption of a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation suggests that the presence or absence of a particular product in the ETM can, in part, determine the interactions that occur among the available products. 19 This complex interaction of alternate product availability and resulting consumption would be difficult to model in traditional behavioral economic methods involving choice between, at most, three products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation suggests that the presence or absence of a particular product in the ETM can, in part, determine the interactions that occur among the available products. 19 This complex interaction of alternate product availability and resulting consumption would be difficult to model in traditional behavioral economic methods involving choice between, at most, three products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act gave the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulatory authority over tobacco products, including the authority to set nicotine levels in cigarettes. Further leveraging the utility of the reinforcement analysis, the Smith et al (2014–in this issue) contribution to this Special Issue demonstrates how the effects of varying nicotine levels in cigarettes can be understood within a behavioral economic analysis of unit price, allowing for relatively precise quantification of those effects as well as a rich set of testable predictions on potential impacts.…”
Section: Behavior Change Health and Health Disparitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, smoke exposure is the most relevant outcome from a public health perspective, and it is important to note that the relationship between nicotine consumption and smoke exposure is different for increases in cigarette cost and decreases in nicotine content. In the present self-administration paradigm, nicotine infusions might be thought of as analogous to smoke exposure (Smith et al 2014). However, when unit price is increased through decreases in the nicotine content of cigarettes, cumulative smoke exposure will not track with the changes in nicotine consumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A behavioral economics framework may be useful for researchers and policy makers interested in nicotine reduction (Donny et al 2012; Smith et al 2014). Within the framework of behavioral economics, changes in the consumption of a reinforcer occur as a function of the unit price of that reinforcer, and unit price can be manipulated through changes in reinforcer cost and reinforcer magnitude (unit price = reinforcer cost / reinforcer magnitude).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation