1989
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1989.03420090064032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotine vs Placebo Gum in General Medical Practice

Abstract: Three hundred fifteen smokers who attended a family practice clinic and wished to quit smoking were assigned in a random, double-blind manner to receive either nicotine (2 mg) or placebo gum. Smokers initially received brief advice from a physician and nurse, a slide presentation and written materials (29 to 35 minutes), and a single follow-up visit (12 to 20 minutes) one week after cessation. After corrections for marital status and income, 10% of those who received nicotine gum and 7% of those who received p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only four nicotine patch studies have examined whether blindness failure moderated medication efficacy. Three studies found no evidence of moderation (Hall et al, 1987; Hughes et al, 1989; Tonnesen et al, 1991). In the fourth study, which investigated whether the nicotine patch helped smokers to reduce their smoking, Dar et al (2005) found a significantly greater reduction in smoking among participants in both the active and placebo conditions who guessed that they received active medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Only four nicotine patch studies have examined whether blindness failure moderated medication efficacy. Three studies found no evidence of moderation (Hall et al, 1987; Hughes et al, 1989; Tonnesen et al, 1991). In the fourth study, which investigated whether the nicotine patch helped smokers to reduce their smoking, Dar et al (2005) found a significantly greater reduction in smoking among participants in both the active and placebo conditions who guessed that they received active medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Under these assumptions 300 smokers were to be randomly assigned to each group. The 6-month period was chosen because evidence suggests that cessation rates at 6 and 12 months do not differ substantially [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] and in a lower socioeconomic status population, it may have been difficult to follow up all participants for a year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, trials moved into more typical treatment settings (e.g. general hospitals [27], hospital outpatient smoking cessation clinics [28], primary care [29] and even over-thecounter settings [30,31]) and some of these studies obtained less impressive results. For example, the British Thoracic Society study randomised over 1500 patients to nicotine or placebo gum with or without an informational booklet and found that less than 10% quit overall; those receiving nicotine gum did not have better cessation outcomes than those receiving placebo [32].…”
Section: Concerns About 'Real World' Effectiveness Of Nrtmentioning
confidence: 99%