“…In five of these studies the hypothesis was tested that nicotinic acid has a beneficial action over and above the effects achievable by standard treatments; in three studies the therapeutic efficacy of nicotinic acid is presumably facilitated by the administration of ascorbic acid, pyridoxine and d'penicillamine; in three studies, the presence of the 'mauve factor', 'pink spot', or a 'bufotenin-like substance' in the urine as indicators of a favourable therapeutic outcome with nicotinic acid is to be tested; and in one study, that exacerbation of schizophrenic psychopathology, induced by the associated administration of a methyl-donor and a monoamine oxidase inhibitor, can be prevented or counteracted by nicotinic acid administration. The First Progress Report on the CMHA Collaborative Study was presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psychiatric Association in June 1970 and published by the Canadian Mental Health Association later that year (6). In view of the controversial clinical findings in the first two completed clinical trials (1,24), and in the absence of verified indicators of therapeutic responsiveness, Progress Report I concluded that the practical decision as to whether nicotinic acid should be prescribed must be influenced by consideration of its known adverse effects.…”