2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4517-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Niels Bohr and Complementarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
123
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
123
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…40,[48][49][50] In this context, the typical signatures of quantum physics appear as result of the impossibility to gather data about the (atomic) objects without significantly disturbing their behavior. While this viewpoint is implicit in the LI derivation of equations such as the Schrödinger equation, [1][2][3] in our view, the separation procedure discussed in the present paper does not really address this issue.…”
Section: Relation To Previous Work 41 Subject-object Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40,[48][49][50] In this context, the typical signatures of quantum physics appear as result of the impossibility to gather data about the (atomic) objects without significantly disturbing their behavior. While this viewpoint is implicit in the LI derivation of equations such as the Schrödinger equation, [1][2][3] in our view, the separation procedure discussed in the present paper does not really address this issue.…”
Section: Relation To Previous Work 41 Subject-object Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What would be describable and publicly communicable in terms of classical concepts, then, are "phenomena", that is, the effects of the interactions between quantum objects and measuring instruments which classically manifest in measuring instruments [22] (p. 168). The classical concepts, such as "the concepts of distance and time interval between different superposed or entangled components are undefined as long as they remain unobserved, i.e., free of interactions with macroscopic systems [14] …”
Section: Pragmatic Information: An Epistemological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the early days of quantum mechanics, the unspeakability of quantum systems was accepted by almost everyone. Thinking of the quantum world as ineffable and beyond the reach of thought [22], forgetting that the quantum world is the one in front of our noses, encouraged the perception that quantum mechanical measurements are so utterly different from classical ones that no points of contact with classical concepts are possible. In particular, it encouraged the assumption that the classical concept of error cannot carry over to quantum mechanics in any shape or form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%