2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10468-020-10000-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nilpotent Elements and Reductive Subgroups Over a Local Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. The existence of x and ϕ follow from [McN,Theorem 4.5.2] and the arguments in [McN,Proof of Corollary 9.2.2]. Concerning uniqueness, since the morphism G(O) → G(F) is surjective (by [EGA4,Théorème 18.5.17]) we can assume that x ′ F = y.…”
Section: The Springer Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Proof. The existence of x and ϕ follow from [McN,Theorem 4.5.2] and the arguments in [McN,Proof of Corollary 9.2.2]. Concerning uniqueness, since the morphism G(O) → G(F) is surjective (by [EGA4,Théorème 18.5.17]) we can assume that x ′ F = y.…”
Section: The Springer Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Concerning uniqueness, since the morphism G(O) → G(F) is surjective (by [EGA4,Théorème 18.5.17]) we can assume that x ′ F = y. In this case the claim is proved in [McN,Corollary 7.3.2]. The other important property we will use is the following.…”
Section: The Springer Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We say that a section x is balanced if G x K K and G x F F are smooth group schemes and dim G x K K = dim G x F F (cf. [Mc3]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%