2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41397-021-00258-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nine-gene pharmacogenomics profile service: The Mayo Clinic experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our investigation, other investigators evaluated DGIs using linked prescription and genetic data and have reported between 1% and 73% of patients experienced a clinically significant DGI 10,24,25,29–33 . The wide variability in reported clinically significant DGIs can likely be attributed to differences in the evaluated genes and medications, as well as the population demographics of the cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to our investigation, other investigators evaluated DGIs using linked prescription and genetic data and have reported between 1% and 73% of patients experienced a clinically significant DGI 10,24,25,29–33 . The wide variability in reported clinically significant DGIs can likely be attributed to differences in the evaluated genes and medications, as well as the population demographics of the cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similarly, an evaluation of prescribing incidence among US payers identified 50% of patients received at least one prescription with a PGx guideline over a 4‐year period, whereas an assessment of the Estonia Biobank found 37% of patients had a PGx prescription as of March 2019 23,24 . In a clinical proof‐of‐concept PGx testing project, 56% of participants who were genotyped on a nine‐gene panel received at least one of up to 35 medications with clinical guidance 25 . These studies all had more limited medication lists than was included in our analysis, notably not including PPIs or NSAIDs, which did not have a CPIC guideline when these studies were completed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is increasingly entering mainstream clinical practice and is of great interest to patients and providers [ 1 ]. Numerous healthcare systems are implementing PGx programs [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ], and statewide initiatives to implement PGx testing are also underway [ 9 , 10 ]. As the clinical utility and uptake of PGx has grown, conversations about PGx have shifted from “should we do PGx testing?” to “how should we best implement PGx testing?” As guideline-producing groups, such as the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium [ 11 ], develop recommendations for how to best apply the scientific evidence, and as clinicians and implementation scientists [ 12 ] develop best practices for clinical implementation, there is one critical voice that must be heard: the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a recent proof-of-concept study by the Mayo Clinic found that pre-emptive use of basic pharmacogenomic testing, alongside participants’ medication history, enabled pharmacists to offer medication improvement opportunities in 56% of participants. 44 Some of the medications involved in the study (e.g., ondansetron, metoprolol, aripiprazole, sertraline, and phenytoin) have been documented as being part of the ISS medication kit. 27 Thus, pre-flight genomic screening could potentially be used to inform medication management and personalized medicine approaches to spaceflight countermeasures.…”
Section: Considerations For a European Space Research Routine Omics P...mentioning
confidence: 99%