2017
DOI: 10.3133/pp1802m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Niobium and tantalum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, by extrinsic doping or in situ from lithiation) whereas carrier doping of titanium­(IV) oxides typically results in lower mobility materials, possibly due to the tendency to form polarons. , From the perspective of availability, the average concentration of niobium in the upper continental crust is 10–26 ppm, comparable to cobalt (10–18 ppm), nickel (19–60 ppm), copper (14–32 ppm), molybdenum (0.6–1.5 ppm), tungsten (0.9–3.3 ppm), tin (1.7–5.5 ppm), lithium (20–41 ppm), vanadium (53–107 ppm), and zinc (52–75 ppm) but far less than Mn (600–735 ppm), Ti (0.45%), and Fe (4.1–4.7%) . In terms of the impact of the readiness of the niobium industry for battery materials, an estimated 74 000 tons of niobium was produced in 2019, but the reserves ( i.e ., economic resources, not total resources) were more than 13 000 000 tons. , According to the U.S. Geological Survey, “[w]­orld resources of niobium are more than adequate to supply projected needs.” However, niobium is considered a critical element owing to its concentrated production, which is estimated at 88% from Brazil, primarily from one company, and 10% from Canada, also primarily from one company. The U.S. Geological Survey also reports that the Elk Creek deposit in Nebraska, United States, is expected to produce niobium after 2020…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, by extrinsic doping or in situ from lithiation) whereas carrier doping of titanium­(IV) oxides typically results in lower mobility materials, possibly due to the tendency to form polarons. , From the perspective of availability, the average concentration of niobium in the upper continental crust is 10–26 ppm, comparable to cobalt (10–18 ppm), nickel (19–60 ppm), copper (14–32 ppm), molybdenum (0.6–1.5 ppm), tungsten (0.9–3.3 ppm), tin (1.7–5.5 ppm), lithium (20–41 ppm), vanadium (53–107 ppm), and zinc (52–75 ppm) but far less than Mn (600–735 ppm), Ti (0.45%), and Fe (4.1–4.7%) . In terms of the impact of the readiness of the niobium industry for battery materials, an estimated 74 000 tons of niobium was produced in 2019, but the reserves ( i.e ., economic resources, not total resources) were more than 13 000 000 tons. , According to the U.S. Geological Survey, “[w]­orld resources of niobium are more than adequate to supply projected needs.” However, niobium is considered a critical element owing to its concentrated production, which is estimated at 88% from Brazil, primarily from one company, and 10% from Canada, also primarily from one company. The U.S. Geological Survey also reports that the Elk Creek deposit in Nebraska, United States, is expected to produce niobium after 2020…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niobium and tantalum have very similar physical and chemical properties and typically occur together in igneous intrusive rocks (Schulz, Piatak, and Papp, 2017). Niobium is dominant in carbonatites and associated alkaline rocks and peralkaline granites and pegmatites.…”
Section: Mode Of Occurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niobium (Nb) is a typical critical element (European Commission 2020). It is intensively used by industry to produce superalloys, superconducting magnets and catalysts (Schulz et al 2017). In the frame of the environmental transition, Nb-based materials are also valued for their large range of innovative properties that result from structural defects (Ismael 2020, Ma et al 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%