“…According to the recommendation of latest NCCN guidelines(2020.v3), the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) could be preserved in cancer patients selected by experienced multidisciplinary teams.Paget's disease, nipple discharge associated with cancer,and imaging evidence of the nipple or subareolar tissues involvement should be excluded,and nipple margin assessment is de nitely needed.However,the standard assessment of NSM candidates and indications are still unde ned and inconsistent.In our study,frozen section examination of nipple margin(retro-areolar tissue) were conducted in all NSM cases,whose results were all consistent to permanent para n sections.One patient sacri ced the NAC due to a positive nipple margin in NSM,but the removed NAC turned out no cancer involved.Smith et al used frozen sections rarely in the procedure of NSM,because they deemed that frozen section was less accurate than permanent pathologic examination,and has di culty in distinguishing benign atypia from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) [21].In a study by D'Alonzo, a discoid specimen beneath the base of the nipple was obtained as nipple margin.They found that the sub-areolar/nipple tissue assessment had a sensitivity of 42.3% in predicting nipple involvement.Though the frozen sections showed a great concordance(92.1%) with nal para n-embedded sections,it should be careful to remove the NAC when DCIS was diagnosed in the frozen section examination [23]. Additionally, Ponzone suggested to perform double intra-operative assessment of subareolar ducts and proximal nipple ducts,to increase the sensitivity of intraoperative pathological assessment [24].…”