1999
DOI: 10.33584/jnzg.1999.61.2340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NIRS: Forage analysis and livestock feeding

Abstract: This paper describes analysis by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) and demonstrates the capacity of this technology to provide rapid, low cost and accurate estimates of feed composition. The need for an extensive database against which the instruments is calibrated and the importance of good wet chemistry backup to NIRS are emphasised, together with some of the diverse uses for NIRS in research and agriculture. Examples are given of contrasting analyses for quality of maize silage and pastu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
114
5
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
114
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The nutritive value of the samples was determined by FeedTECH, AgResearch, Palmerston North. Samples were analysed using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) as described by Corson et al (1999) to determine the acid detergent fibre (ADF), ash and total crude protein content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nutritive value of the samples was determined by FeedTECH, AgResearch, Palmerston North. Samples were analysed using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) as described by Corson et al (1999) to determine the acid detergent fibre (ADF), ash and total crude protein content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplicate samples of all feeds were dried at either 100°C for DM analysis, or at 60°C for analysis of nutrient composition. All samples dried at 60°C were dried for 72 h, ground to pass through a 1.0-mm sieve (Christy Lab Mill, Suffolk, UK) and analyzed for CP, NDF, ADF, NSC, lipid, and ash by near infrared spectroscopy (Corson et al, 1999). The ME content was derived directly from predicted OM digestibility on the basis of an in vitro cellulase digestibility assay, which had been calibrated against in vivo standards (Corson et al, 1999).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter samples were then ground to pass through a 1.0-mm sieve (Christy Lab Mill, Suffolk, UK) and analyzed for CP, NDF, ADF, WSC, fat, ash, and OM digestibility by near-infrared spectroscopy Table 2. Number of records, transformed mean 1 (and SD), backtransformed mean, and CV (%) for plasma ghrelin (pg/mL), growth hormone (GH; ng/mL), NEFA (mmol/L), and glucose (mmol/L) concentrations pre-and postfeeding, and the postprandial change in plasma ghrelin concentration (Δ-ghrelin) in dairy cows 75 and 79 (±19.7) DIM (Corson et al, 1999). The ME was derived directly from predicted OM digestibility, on the basis of an in vitro cellulase digestibility assay that had been calibrated against in vivo standards (Corson et al, 1999).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%