1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1998.tb00135.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrate leaching loss following application of organic manures to sandy soils in arable cropping.

Abstract: Abstract. Experiments were set up at two sites to measure nitrogen (N) leaching loss from applications of separated pig/cattle slurry and cattle farmyard manure(FYM), during winters 1990/91–1993/94 (site A) and from broiler litter and FYM, during winters 1990/91–1992/93 (site B). The manures were applied at a target rate of 200 kg ha‐1 total N during the autumn and winter to overwinter fallow or top dressed onto winter rye. The total N in leachate was calculated from leachate N concentrations, in samples coll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, detailed information on local nutrient flow pathways and drainage systems is highly needed. It should also be emphasised that the mitigation measures discussed in this review only target drainage water, while other mitigation measures, such as cover crops, target the water before it leaves the root zone (Beckwith et al 1998 ) or restored wetlands that target water further downstream (Audet et al 2014 ). Consequently, it is essential that the drainage mitigation measures should complement and not compensate for farm management practices producing high pesticide, N or P leaching that influences other flow paths such as groundwater or surface runoff.…”
Section: Perspective: Opportunities and Challenges For Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, detailed information on local nutrient flow pathways and drainage systems is highly needed. It should also be emphasised that the mitigation measures discussed in this review only target drainage water, while other mitigation measures, such as cover crops, target the water before it leaves the root zone (Beckwith et al 1998 ) or restored wetlands that target water further downstream (Audet et al 2014 ). Consequently, it is essential that the drainage mitigation measures should complement and not compensate for farm management practices producing high pesticide, N or P leaching that influences other flow paths such as groundwater or surface runoff.…”
Section: Perspective: Opportunities and Challenges For Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swine manure is a source of valuable nutrients (Chastain et al, 1999), but mismanagement or improper application to soils makes it a potential environmental threat. The application rate of animal manure is often exceeded beyond the plant requirement (Juergens-Gschwind, 1989), and this excessive manure application to the soil can result in an unintended N leaching loss to groundwater (Beckwith et al, 1998). High liquid manure application to soil could also contribute to heavy metals like copper and zinc accumulation to soil and plant systems that generate a risk of contaminating the animal food chain to a threat (Mantovi et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the negative environmental impacts of manure mismanagement have received notoriety. Manure NO 3 is prone to leaching and can be an important source of pollution to groundwater [2,3]. To achieve a balance of agronomic benefit and minimal environmental pollution, it is necessary to have accurate estimates of the potentially available nutrients in manures and use this knowledge to make correct management decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%