2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrate reduction in a simulated free-water surface wetland system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sirivedhin and Gray (2006) reported that the potential denitrification rate increased more than two orders of magnitude when the temperature rose from 4 • C to 25 • C. Value of 15 • C was usually selected as a bound above which efficient nitrogen removal could be achieved owing to the properly functioned microorganisms and vegetation (Kuschk et al, 2003;Kadlec and Wallace, 2009;Kotti et al, 2010). In this study, k values declined sharply when the temperature decreased from 15 • C to lower than 10 • C in autumn, and almost no nitrogen removal occurred in winter with temperatures consistently below 10 • C. This finding was in agreement with Misiti et al (2011). Inhibited activity of denitrifying bacteria was the primary reason for poor nitrate removal at low temperature alone with plant senescence (Mitsch and Gosselink, 2000;Hernandez and Mitsch, 2007).…”
Section: Crucial Influencing Factors For Nitrogen Removalsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sirivedhin and Gray (2006) reported that the potential denitrification rate increased more than two orders of magnitude when the temperature rose from 4 • C to 25 • C. Value of 15 • C was usually selected as a bound above which efficient nitrogen removal could be achieved owing to the properly functioned microorganisms and vegetation (Kuschk et al, 2003;Kadlec and Wallace, 2009;Kotti et al, 2010). In this study, k values declined sharply when the temperature decreased from 15 • C to lower than 10 • C in autumn, and almost no nitrogen removal occurred in winter with temperatures consistently below 10 • C. This finding was in agreement with Misiti et al (2011). Inhibited activity of denitrifying bacteria was the primary reason for poor nitrate removal at low temperature alone with plant senescence (Mitsch and Gosselink, 2000;Hernandez and Mitsch, 2007).…”
Section: Crucial Influencing Factors For Nitrogen Removalsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, carbon source has been substantially proven to be a crucial limiting factor for nitrate removal (Gersberg et al, 1983;Ingersoll and Baker, 1998;Gagnon et al, 2010;Kozub and Liehr, 1999), especially when the COD:N was below 3:1 (Misiti et al, 2011). The favorable COD:N for denitrification in CWs was reported to be 3:1-7:1 in the references (Ingersoll and Baker, 1998;Lin et al, 2002;Gagnon et al, 2010;Misiti et al, 2011;Narváez et al, 2011).…”
Section: Nitrogen Removal Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This failure is strongly proven to be the main limitation in promoting nitrogen removal. Misiti et al (2011) reported the severe impact of a COD/T-N value of below 3 on denitrification. In the current study, the mean COD/T-N values in the two VBFs were 6.6 and 3.6 (Table 4).…”
Section: Nitrogen Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8). A C/N ratio of less than 5 is believed to be obstructive to the reduction of nitrates (Misiti et al (2011)). However, TN concentrations in the effluent were mostly below 20 mg/L, meeting the category 1B standard of GB 18918-2002.…”
Section: Pilot-scale Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%