Accepted ManuscriptThis is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
AbstractThe mechanism that accounts for the observed experimental activation energy for the decomposition of ethylamine (EA) is still unknown. This paper reports the first detailed study of possible mechanisms for the pyrolysis of second-stage cracking product of ethylamine: the decomposition reaction of methanimine, ethanimine, and aminoethylene. Investigated reactions charactarise either H 2 elimination or 1,3-proton shift. These pathways result in the removal of H 2 , CH 4 , and NH 3 ; and the formation of hydrogen cyanide, acetylene, acetonitrile, ethynamine, and ketenimine. The IRC analysis was carried out for all transition state structures to obtain the complete reaction pathways. The stationary points were fully optimized at B3LYP and MP2 levels of theory using the 6-31G(d), 6-31G(2df,p), and 6-31++G(3df,3dp) basis sets. Based on comparing energetic requirements, we find 1,3-proton shift is the most probable pathway for the decomposition of ethanimine. The decomposition reaction of ethenamine was the most plausible reaction with an activation energy of 297 kJ mol −1 calculated at the composite method of G4MP2.