1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2680.1998.1810021.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitric oxide as neuromodulator of sympathetic transmission in rat vas deferens

Abstract: 1. Electrical field stimulation (EFS) of muscle strips in vitro elicited a tetrodotoxin (TTX)-sensitive biphasic contractile response consisting of a phasic component followed by a tonic one. 2. The amplitude of both components of the response was impaired by N omega-nitro-L-arginine and potentiated by sodium nitroprusside. Cystamine caused a reduction in amplitude of both phasic and tonic components of the response to EFS. Neither N omega-nitro-L-arginine, sodium nitroprusside, nor cystamine induced changes i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1A). Although the nitrergic route did not seem to possess any physiological role, it has been demonstrated that exogenous NO could inhibit neurotransmission in rat vas deferens (Cederqvist and Gustafsson, 1994), although opposite effects, e.g., an enhancement of neurotransmission, have also been observed (Postorino et al, 1998;Ventura et al, 1998). In our experiments, NO released from SNAP clearly inhibited sympathetic neurotransmission (Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1A). Although the nitrergic route did not seem to possess any physiological role, it has been demonstrated that exogenous NO could inhibit neurotransmission in rat vas deferens (Cederqvist and Gustafsson, 1994), although opposite effects, e.g., an enhancement of neurotransmission, have also been observed (Postorino et al, 1998;Ventura et al, 1998). In our experiments, NO released from SNAP clearly inhibited sympathetic neurotransmission (Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Although some reports have been published on the attenuation of neurotransmission by using NOS-inhibitors such as L-NAME or L-NNA (Vladimirova et al, 1994;Postorino et al, 1998), most researchers have observed no effect with these inhibitors (Allawi et al, 1994;Ventura and Burnstock, 1997;Ventura et al, 1998). These observations cast doubts on the participation of endogenous NO on neurotransmission in rat vas deferens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NOS is present not only in vascular endothelial cells (endothelial NOS) but also in perivascular nerves [neuronal NOS (nNOS)] (Moncada and Higgs, 1995;Sosunov et al, 1995). Inhibition of NOS by NOS inhibitors such as the nonselective NOS inhibitor N--nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) has been reported to augment the vasoconstrictor effect induced by PNS in various isolated blood vessels, whereas the enhanced PNS-induced responses to NOS inhibitors are reversed by L-arginine, a precursor for the synthesis of NO, and involve the endothelium-derived NO (Toda and Okamura, 1990;Postorino et al, 1998). On the other hand, several studies showed that NOS inhibitors have no effect on vasoconstriction in response to PNS in dog pulmonary arteries and human omental arteries without endothelium (Aldasoro et al, 1993;Segarra et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, (Postorino et al. 1998; Nakanishi et al. 2006) reported that NO facilitates sympathetic neurotransmission in rat and guinea-pig vas deferens rather than inhibiting it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%