2010
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.49.04dg06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitride-Based Metal–Semiconductor–Metal Photodetectors with InN/GaN Multiple Nucleation Layers

Abstract: GaN metal–semiconductor–metal (MSM) photodetectors with InN/GaN multiple nucleation layers were proposed and fabricated. We achieved a much smaller dark current and a larger photocurrent-to-dark current ratio from the proposed device with InN/GaN multiple nucleation layers than that from the GaN MSM photodetector with conventional single low-temperature GaN nucleation layer. We also achieved a much larger UV-to-visible spectral response ratio of photoresponse at 360–450 nm from the photodetector with InN/GaN m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our self‐powered nanosystem can detect light down to a nW/cm 2 level (fW light illuminating onto the NW). The responsivity for UV, blue, and green light with intensity of 2.3 nW cm −2 (equal to 25 fW light illumination onto the NW) of the system were 1180, 344, and 332 A W −1 , respectively, which is two to three orders of magnitude higher than that received using a nitride based metal–semiconductor–metal photodetector12 and a silicon NW photodetector 13. Figure 3 d shows the photocurrent versus light intensity for UV, blue, and green light, respectively, indicating that the photocurrent increased linearly with the optical power for sub‐μW/cm 2 light detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Our self‐powered nanosystem can detect light down to a nW/cm 2 level (fW light illuminating onto the NW). The responsivity for UV, blue, and green light with intensity of 2.3 nW cm −2 (equal to 25 fW light illumination onto the NW) of the system were 1180, 344, and 332 A W −1 , respectively, which is two to three orders of magnitude higher than that received using a nitride based metal–semiconductor–metal photodetector12 and a silicon NW photodetector 13. Figure 3 d shows the photocurrent versus light intensity for UV, blue, and green light, respectively, indicating that the photocurrent increased linearly with the optical power for sub‐μW/cm 2 light detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To overcome the sensor’s aboriginal capabilities, various techniques to improve sensitivity have recently been suggested. First, utilizing nanostructures for modulation of response was reported, but the methods involve time-consuming fabrication processes, expensive facilities, or are infeasible for microscale devices [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. To avoid complicated structures, a surface modification of graphene using specialized functional molecules was suggested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, nitride−based alloys, such as AlN, GaN and InN, have achieved great success in the applications of optoelectronic devices such as light emitting diodes [1,2], lasers [3][4][5], solar cells [6][7][8], and photodetectors [9][10][11][12]. One of the key features about this nitride-based materials is the direct bandgap energy covering from 0.7 eV (for InN) to 6.2 eV (for AlN), and thus provides wide range of absorption from ultraviolet to infrared [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%