1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0929-1393(98)00166-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrification potential in field-collected soils contaminated with Pb or Cu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current literature (Sauvé et al 1999(Sauvé et al , 2000bTack and Verloo 1995) agrees that total soil metal is not a good predictor of bioavailability or potential risk from soil contamination. However, the determination of potential toxicity and bioavailability of trace elements in soils is difficult to perform and no widely accepted method exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The current literature (Sauvé et al 1999(Sauvé et al , 2000bTack and Verloo 1995) agrees that total soil metal is not a good predictor of bioavailability or potential risk from soil contamination. However, the determination of potential toxicity and bioavailability of trace elements in soils is difficult to perform and no widely accepted method exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, OM improved the regression model (R 2 =0.32), being a positively related with PNR. Similarly, Sauvé et al (1999) indicated that the response of this bioassay was determined by pH (range of 3.5 to 7.8) and soil OM (range of 0.6 to 5.8%) (R 2 =0.43).…”
Section: Effect Of Physicochemical Properties Of Soils On Pnr and Nminmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Specifically, Smolders et al (2001) indicated that soil pH (average of 5.4 ± 1.5) is the main variable determining the PNR of non-contaminated soils. Likewise, Sauvé et al (1999) found that pH (average of 6.3 ± 1.2) is a significant variable determining PNR in field-contaminated soils. These authors reported that the nitrification process was inhibited at pH values below 5.6 and 6.0, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concentrations of F À and NO 2À 2 showed no correlation to any other ion. This is due to formation of NO 2À 2 from ammonium (Sauve et al, 1999), and input of F À from other sources than the dominant ions, possibly sharing a common cation with one of the dominant salts.…”
Section: Identification Of Ions Sources By Multivariable Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%