2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0312-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen accumulation in plant tissues and roots and N mineralization under oilseeds, pulses, and spring wheat

Abstract: To understand how pulse and oilseed crops might use nitrogen (N) more efficiently under varying levels of water and N availability in soil, we conducted a 2-year field study to monitor N accumulation in aboveground (AG-N) and root material at five growth stages, for canola (Brassica napus L.), mustard (Brassica juncea L.), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), dry pea (Pisum sativum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris Medicum) alongside spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crops were grown in lysimeters (15 cm diameter × … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
22
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a comparison of wheat, oilseeds and pulses at the Swift Current site, Gan et al (2010) observed maximum accumulation of NO 3 --N under wheat, but similar accumulations between oilseeds and pulses (including field pea and lentil). Canola and wheat were also found to have comparable root N (kg N ha -1 ) compared to pulse crops (Gan et al 2010) indicating that despite the ability of pulse crops to fix their own N, the below-ground residues may not have a greater contribution to the net N benefit compared to fertilized wheat or oilseeds. Interestingly, they also observed similar apparent net N mineralization under W-CNL wheat-canola; W_0N continuous wheat, no N fertilizer; W_WN continuous wheat with N fertilizer; W-FP wheat-field pea; W-L wheat-lentil wheat and pulses, but rates under oilseeds were about 50 % lower (Gan et al 2010).…”
Section: Effect Of Pulse Crops In the Rotationmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a comparison of wheat, oilseeds and pulses at the Swift Current site, Gan et al (2010) observed maximum accumulation of NO 3 --N under wheat, but similar accumulations between oilseeds and pulses (including field pea and lentil). Canola and wheat were also found to have comparable root N (kg N ha -1 ) compared to pulse crops (Gan et al 2010) indicating that despite the ability of pulse crops to fix their own N, the below-ground residues may not have a greater contribution to the net N benefit compared to fertilized wheat or oilseeds. Interestingly, they also observed similar apparent net N mineralization under W-CNL wheat-canola; W_0N continuous wheat, no N fertilizer; W_WN continuous wheat with N fertilizer; W-FP wheat-field pea; W-L wheat-lentil wheat and pulses, but rates under oilseeds were about 50 % lower (Gan et al 2010).…”
Section: Effect Of Pulse Crops In the Rotationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Canola and wheat were also found to have comparable root N (kg N ha -1 ) compared to pulse crops (Gan et al 2010) indicating that despite the ability of pulse crops to fix their own N, the below-ground residues may not have a greater contribution to the net N benefit compared to fertilized wheat or oilseeds. Interestingly, they also observed similar apparent net N mineralization under W-CNL wheat-canola; W_0N continuous wheat, no N fertilizer; W_WN continuous wheat with N fertilizer; W-FP wheat-field pea; W-L wheat-lentil wheat and pulses, but rates under oilseeds were about 50 % lower (Gan et al 2010). This last finding may be supported by Sangster et al (2010), who found significantly higher total root biomass in canola compared to field pea (including both living biomass and root exudates, quantified using 13 C labeling), but also noted that based on its biochemical composition, canola root biomass was likely more recalcitrant than field pea root biomass.…”
Section: Effect Of Pulse Crops In the Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tanede azot içeriği sulanan koşullarda (% 3.409) sulanmayan koşullara (% 3.272) oranla daha yüksek belirlenmiştir. Bunun nedeni generatif devrede yüksek olan azot içeriğinin ve kuru madde miktarının sulanan koşullarda taneye daha fazla taşınmasıdır (Gan et al 2010;Yağmur & Kaydan 2011).…”
unclassified