2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-021-05065-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in an ombrotrophic peatland: a benchmark for assessing change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations suggest that, due to the interspecific variations of eco‐physiological strategies, the biomass responses to N enrichment are divergent among plant growth forms in boreal peatlands. Similar to N, P is also an important nutrient for plant growth in peatlands (Øien, 2004; Li et al, 2019; Salmon et al, 2021), especially in rich fens (Øien & Moen, 2001; Øien et al, 2018), given that N enrichment often aggravates P limitation of plant production by disturbing the stoichiometric balance between N and P (Li et al, 2016). In this peatland, elevating soil N:P ratio after N addition (Appendix S2) indicates the N:P stoichiometric imbalance, implying that P availability may determine the ultimate response of plant biomass to N enrichment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations suggest that, due to the interspecific variations of eco‐physiological strategies, the biomass responses to N enrichment are divergent among plant growth forms in boreal peatlands. Similar to N, P is also an important nutrient for plant growth in peatlands (Øien, 2004; Li et al, 2019; Salmon et al, 2021), especially in rich fens (Øien & Moen, 2001; Øien et al, 2018), given that N enrichment often aggravates P limitation of plant production by disturbing the stoichiometric balance between N and P (Li et al, 2016). In this peatland, elevating soil N:P ratio after N addition (Appendix S2) indicates the N:P stoichiometric imbalance, implying that P availability may determine the ultimate response of plant biomass to N enrichment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the predominance of the hummock–hollow microtopography across the bog, we used this peatland to investigate how moss decomposition varied at the microtopographic scale. The distribution of hummocks versus hollows in this bog was estimated at 67% hummocks and 33% hollows using terrestrial laser scanning (data citation – Graham et al 2019, Malhotra et al 2020, Salmon et al 2021). This bog has the greatest water table fluctuation compared to six other research peatlands on the MEF, with the historical record ranging from several centimeters above the surface to 1.4 m below the peat surface in hollows (Sebestyen et al 2011a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haapalehto et al (2014) reported longterm decreases in DOC and nutrient leaching but temporary increases in N and P for the first 5 years of degraded peatland restoration. In addition, major nutrient such as phosphorus and nitrogen content has been extensively studied in a restored peatland (Moore et al, 2005;Nieminen et al, 2017a;Munir et al, 2017;Salmon et al, 2021).…”
Section: Cluster #3mentioning
confidence: 99%