2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen dioxide and ozone levels in urban tree canopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using passive samplers, Harris and Manning (2010) measured the concentrations of O 3 and NO 2 inside and directly adjacent to individual tree canopies and found that the average NO 2 concentrations were significantly higher inside the canopies than outside; conversely, O 3 concentrations were higher outside the canopy. Based on these findings Harris and Manning (2010) concluded that current models may be insufficient for describing exposure to and uptake of NO 2 and O 3 by urban trees, particularly for those not forming a closed canopy with neighboring trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By using passive samplers, Harris and Manning (2010) measured the concentrations of O 3 and NO 2 inside and directly adjacent to individual tree canopies and found that the average NO 2 concentrations were significantly higher inside the canopies than outside; conversely, O 3 concentrations were higher outside the canopy. Based on these findings Harris and Manning (2010) concluded that current models may be insufficient for describing exposure to and uptake of NO 2 and O 3 by urban trees, particularly for those not forming a closed canopy with neighboring trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the relation between tree traits (e.g., crown geometry and foliage distribution), "urban street canyon", and weather conditions are complex and cannot be evaluated using i-Tree Eco. For example, low turbulence may promote deposition and increase the N 2 O and CO concentrations or O 3 formation due to longer residence time [86].…”
Section: Uncertainties Associated With Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistically significant reductions of NO 2 concentrations inside holm oak forests were found in TC and LC, with averaged values of 13% and 6%, respectively. These reductions are comparable to (Grundström and Pleijel, 2014) or higher than (Harris and Manning, 2010;Setälä et al, 2013) values reported in similar empirical studies with deciduous forest species. The larger differences in NO 2 levels in LC were detected during spring, the time when holm oak forests usually show higher stomatal conductance (Alonso et al, 2008).…”
Section: Below-canopy Reduction Of Atmospheric Pollutant Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 65%