An experiment was carried out in brackish seawater mesocosms to investigate the impacts of different N:P ratios and frequency of nutrient supply on phytoplankton and zooplankton communities in the Archipelago Sea, part of the northern Baltic Sea. The experiment used a 2 × 2 factorial design in which nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) were added in either an N-deficient or Redfield ratio either daily or at 1 wk intervals. Both phytoplankton total biomass and the biomass of most phytoplankton groups increased most in the enrichments with a Redfield ratio. The effect of nutrient addition frequencies varied with time and between the 2 nutrient ratios. The biomass of heterocystous N 2 -fixing cyanobacteria was highest in the daily nutrient enrichment, while chlorophytes increased most in the weekly Redfield treatment. The concentration of cyanobacterian hepatotoxins increased during the experiment, but was not affected by the nutrient enrichments. The biomass of calanoid copepods increased more in the weekly than in the daily enrichments when the nutrients were supplied in a Redfield ratio. Small rotifers, on the other hand, were favored by the Redfield nutrient enrichment, especially when the nutrients were added daily. Based on the results of this study it seems that a daily nutrient supply favors cyanobacterial growth, while an intermittent but heavier nutrient discharge may result in a more advantageous plankton community, with fewer cyanobacteria and a zooplankton community dominated by larger species.KEY WORDS: Phytoplankton · Cyanobacteria · Zooplankton · Nutrient pulsing · Nutrient ratio · Mesocosm · Factorial design · Baltic Sea
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 332: [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92] 2007 Phytoplankton species selection based on competition for nutrients is dependent on species-specific differences in nutrient transport kinetics, assimilation, and storage capacity (Tilman et al. 1982, Sommer 1989. Sommer (1985) divided algae into 3 categories based on their ability to utilize nutrients: (1) affinity specialists -species that have low requirements for nutrients and are efficient users of low nutrient concentrations; (2) velocity specialists -species that have high uptake and growth rates and are able to utilize temporary nutrient enrichment for rapid growth; and (3) storage specialists -species that are capable of storing nutrients in intracellular pools and which usually have relatively high uptake rates but only moderate maximum growth rates. A low and continuous nutrient supply should select for affinity specialists, whereas a pulsed nutrient supply should favor both velocity specialists that are capable of rapid growth after nutrient pulses and storage specialists that are capable of luxury consumption (Sommer 1985, Grover 1991.The nutrient kinetics of phytoplankton are strongly related to size (Stolte & Riegman 1996). Small algal species, with a high cellular surface to volume ratio, a...